Laserfiche WebLink
811HIC1+111HR <br /> Mr. Bill Vizza <br /> 30 November 1993 <br /> Page 3 <br /> After the sample was retrieved from the split-spoon sampler the ends of the middle sample <br /> tube were covered with Teflon sheets secured by tight-fitting plastic caps. The sample was <br /> then labelled with a unique sample number, the date and time collected, and placed in an <br /> ice-chilled cooler for preservation prior to transport to a State-certified laboratory for <br /> analyses. <br /> Soil samples from top and bottom tubes and drill cuttings were classified using the Unified <br /> Soil Classification System in accordance with ASTM Standard Method D2488-84, <br /> "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedures)". Logs showing the <br /> i <br /> monitoring well construction are attached to this report <br /> All soil samples retrieved were screened in the field using an organic vapor analyzer (OVA). <br /> Field screening results are presented on the attached well logs. Selected samples were <br /> delivered under Chain of Custody documentation to Matrix Environmental Laboratories in <br /> Rancho Cordova, a State-certified laboratory, for analysis. <br /> . To minimize the potential for cross-contamination, all augers and associated equipment <br /> were steam cleaned with a high-pressure washer prior to drilling each boring The split- <br /> spoon sampler, associated sampling equipment, and the brass sample tubes were cleaned <br /> with a trisodium phosphate wash and rinsed with distilled water prior to collecting each soil <br /> sample. <br /> Soil cuttings were placed in 17H drums for temporary storage at the site. After each <br /> boring had been drilled to its total depth, it was converted to a monitoring well. <br /> Qualitative Field Screening <br /> To provide a preliminary indication of possible hydrocarbon contamination, a portable <br /> organic vapor analyzer was used to perform a field hydrocarbon vapor test on soil not sent <br /> to the laboratory for analysis. The field test consisted of filling a plastic Ziplock bag with <br /> soil and sealing the bag. The bags were then placed in the sun to promote the volatilization <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons that may have been present in the sample After approximately <br /> 15 minutes a hole was opened in the top of the bag and an OVA probe was inserted in the <br /> headspace and the concentration of organic vapors present in the headspace was noted in <br /> parts per million by volume The organic vapor analyzer used in this investigation was a <br /> Foxboro Model 128 portable OVA with a flame ionization detector, calibrated to a methane <br /> standard. <br /> Field screening also included visual observation of samples, noting any staining or changes <br /> in color or appearance which might suggest the presence or absence of petroleum <br />