Laserfiche WebLink
i. <br /> j kwoo v <br /> Kennedy/Je *9I Chuen <br /> Mr. Tom Terrill <br /> Reynolds and Brown <br /> 26 January 1987 <br /> Page Three <br /> Undisturbed soil samples were collected at five toot intervals <br /> using a 2. 5-inch outside diameter California Modified Drive <br /> Sampler. The sampler was driven 18 inches below the bottom of <br /> the auger bit using a 140-pound hammer which fell over a 30--inch <br /> interval. Each sampler was equipped with three 1. 5-inch diam- <br /> eter, 6-inch long brass liners for preservation and handling of <br /> collected samples. The sampler and brass liners were steam <br /> cleaned initially and between subsequent uses to minimize <br /> cross-contamination of samples. <br /> J <br /> One liner from each sample drive was preserved for chemical <br /> analysis. These liners sample were covered on each end with <br /> teflon sheets, capped with vinyl end covers, and sealed with <br /> plastic tape to minimize the loss of volatile constituents. <br /> These samples were chilled and transported to Kennedy/Jenks/ <br /> Chilton' s Laboratory Division for analysis. Chain of custody <br /> forms were maintained throughout sample collection and trans- <br /> port. Two soil samples from each boring were selected for chem- <br /> ical. analysis. <br /> Headspace analysis for the presence of organic vapors was also <br /> performed in the field on a separate soil sample from each sam- <br /> pler interval . A portion of the soil sample selected for head- <br /> space analysis was extruded into a pre-cleaned glass jar which <br /> was covered with aluminum foil and allowed to sit in a warm area <br /> for five to ten minutes. The head space (the space in the jar <br /> above the soil sample) was then monitored for total organic <br /> vapors by inserting the intake tube of a Foxboro Model 128 por- <br /> table organic vapor analyzer through the aluminum foil. The <br /> maximum organic vapor concentration detected was recorded. <br /> Headspace organic vapor monitoring was performed as a field <br /> method for evaluating the presence of petroleum product in soil , <br /> as well as a criterion for selecting soil samples for laboratory <br /> analysis. <br /> Boring logs that describe subsurface lithology using the Unified <br /> Soil Classification System, depths of sampled intervals, mea- <br /> sured groundwater levels and details of well construction are <br /> presented in Attachment B. <br /> The first two borings, Bl and B2, (see Figure 1 ) , were drilled <br /> to a depth of 15 feet, which was the depth of the first soil <br /> sample collected below the water table. The third boring , B3, <br /> was drilled to a depth of 20 feet. This was done because head- <br /> space monitoring detected organic vapors in the sample from 10 <br />