Laserfiche WebLink
KennedOcn,s CE:�I.on <br /> Mr. Tom Terrill <br /> Reynolds and Brown <br /> 26 January 1987 <br /> Page Three <br /> 1 <br /> Undisturbed soil samples were collected at five foot intervals <br /> using a 2. 5-inch outside diameter California Modified Drive <br /> Sampler. The sampler was driven 18 inches below the bottom of f <br /> the auger bit using a 140-pound hammer which fell over a 30-inch <br /> interval . Each sampler was equipped with three 1. 5-inch diam- <br /> eter, 6-inch long brass liners for preservation and handling f <br /> collected samples. The sampler and brass liners were steam <br /> cleaned initially and between subsequent uses to minimize <br /> cross-contamination of samples. <br /> p <br /> One liner from each sample drive was preserved for chemical <br /> analysis. These liners sample were covered on each end with <br /> teflon sheets , capped with vinyl end covers , and sealed with <br /> plastic tape to minimize the loss of volatile constituents. <br /> These samples were chilled and transported to Kennedy/Jenks/ <br /> Chilton' s Laboratory Division for analysis. Chain of custody <br /> forms were maintained throughout sample collection and trans- <br /> port. Two soil samples from each boring were selected for chem- <br /> ical analysis. <br /> Headspace analysis for the presence of organic vapors was also- <br /> performed in the field on a separate soil sample from each sam- <br /> pler interval . A portion of the soil sample selected for head- <br /> space analysis was extruded into a pre--cleaned glass jar which <br /> was covered with aluminum foil and allowed to sit in a warm area <br /> for five to ten minutes. The head space ( the space in the jar <br /> above, thesoil sample ) was then monitored for total organic <br /> vapors by inserting the intake tube of a Foxboro Model 128 por- <br /> table organic vapor analyzer through the aluminum foil . The <br /> maximum organic vapor concentration detected was recorded. <br /> Headspace organic vapor monitoring was performed as a- field <br /> method for evaluating the presence of petroleum product in soil , <br /> as well as a criterion for selecting soil samples for laboratory <br /> analysis . <br /> Boring logs that describe subsurface lithology using the Unified <br /> Soil Classification System, depths of sampled intervals, mea- <br /> sured aroundwa ter levels and details of well construction are <br /> presented in Attachment B. <br /> The first two borings , Bl and B2 , (see Figure 1 ) , were drilled <br /> to a depth of 15 feet, which was the depth of the first soil <br /> sample collected below the water table. The third boring , B3 , k <br /> was drilled to a depth of 20 feet. This was done because head- <br /> space monitoring detected organic vapors in the sample from 10 <br /> } <br />