Laserfiche WebLink
TABL;,.,,, - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED D.,..a <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: Wal-Mart#2025, 3010 Grant Line Road, Tracy, San Joaquin County <br /> FE1. Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, A formal sensitive receptor survey was not completed. <br /> industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site; The consultant states that no sensitive receptors were <br /> observed within 2,000 feet of the site. <br /> ❑ 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of former and existing tank systems, One 1,000-gallon waste oil <br /> Y <br /> excavation contours and sample locations, boring and monitoring well elevation contours, UST was removed in <br /> gradients, and nearby surface waters, buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities; august 1998. Site maps are <br /> provided. <br /> M3. Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system diagrams; Soil borings show stiff clay to four feet, and <br /> medium stiff clay and silt to 16 feet. <br /> 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal The disposition of excavated soils was not presented. <br /> p g p (quantity); <br /> LE5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; Groundwater was not sampled, and monitoring wells were not installed. <br /> N <br /> 6. Tabulated results of ail groundwater elevations and depths to wafer' Depth to wafer was measured at 16 feet. The <br /> groundwater flow direction is unknown. <br /> Fy 7. Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: Maximum tank pit excavation samples in mg/kg collected at 9 feet <br /> YCI Detection limits for confirmation sampling show TPHg at 16, ethyl benzene at 0.22,xylenes at 1.08, and lead at 4. <br /> June 2000 maximum soll boring results show xylenes at 0.0039 mg/kg. <br /> F Lead analyses All other constituents including MtBE and other fuel oxygenates were <br /> non-detect at acceptable detection limits. <br /> Y08. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil <br /> and groundwater, and both on-site and off--site: Lateral and vertical extent of soil <br /> Lateral and 0 Vertical extent of soil contamination contamination is defined. Groundwater was <br /> F1Lateral and Vertical extent of groundwater contamination not analyzed. <br /> 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface A remediation system was not operated at <br /> 0 remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and this site. <br /> groundwater remediation system; <br /> 10.Reports/information y❑ Unauthorized Release Form FN I QMRs <br /> 0 Boring logs F PAR FRP 171Other(Site Characterization Report) <br /> 0 11.Best Available Technology(BAT) used or an explanation fornot using BAT; Remove USTs, natural attenuation. <br /> '- 112.Reasons why background wasris <br /> unattainable using BA T- Petroleum hydrocarbons remain in on-site soils near the former UST. <br /> f 7N 13.Mass balance calculation of substance <br /> treated versus that remaining; A mass balance was not completed. <br /> 14.Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in risk <br /> assessments, and fate and transport modeling; A risk assessment was not completed. <br /> FY 1 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely Contamination is limited to soil at the former UST. <br /> impact water qualify, health, or other beneficial uses;and Contamination will naturally attenuate. <br /> By: Comments: The site is a Wal-Mart department store. One 1,000-gallon waste oil UST was removed from the site in <br /> August 1998, and tank pit samples showed soil contamination under the concrete pedestal at 9 feet below ground surface. <br /> In June 2000, four soil borings were completed around the former UST to a total depth of 16 feet, and the eight soil <br /> samples showed only xylenes at 0.0039 mg/kg in one boring at 15.5 feet. All other constituents including MtBE and other <br /> D te: fuel oxygenates were non-detect. Due to no staining or odor in soil borings, groundwater was not sampled for analysts, <br /> q�Ji fit and monitoring wells have not been installed. Based on the limited contamination in soil and the lack of sensitive <br /> I receptors, Board staff concur with San Joaquin County's closure recommendation. <br />