Laserfiche WebLink
.. <br /> AT <br /> k b <br /> Clayton <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL <br /> CONSULTANT5 <br /> EPA Method 5030/8015-8020, for gasoline fuel and the volatile hydrocarbons, <br /> benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene. <br /> • EPA Method 418.1 for total recoverable hydrocarbons <br /> All samples were transported to Clayton's laboratory under chain-of-custody. This <br /> .,, farm, along with copies of analytical results are in Appendix E. <br /> 4.2 SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSES <br /> i <br /> `t The results of the laboratory analyses of the soil samples are summarized in Table 2. <br /> All other compounds for which analyses were conducted were below analytical <br /> detection limits, as shown in the Iaboratory report (_Appendix E). <br /> ;;..a <br /> Table 2 shows that the LLJFI'manual guidelines do not apply to the first two chemical <br /> constituents listed due to the shallow groundwater(appro)dmately 8 to 12 feet bgs). <br /> Analytical results revealed a concentration of 770 mg/kg total recoverable <br /> ,-. hydrocarbons from soil sample MW-3B @ 4 feet. This concentration is most likely <br /> r., due to oil and grease. <br /> Although regulatory action levels are not set for oil and grease,when concentrations <br /> E exceed 100 parts per million (ppm) the RWQCB's Recommendations for the <br /> �t Evaluation and Investi atioD of USTsrequires a softroundwater investigation. The <br /> concentrations of total recoverable hydrocarbons Found in the soil at 4 feet in MW=3B <br /> ";"" puts.the site into the RWQCB's "Case 1" category requiring a soil0groundwater <br /> . investigation. This requirement is satisfied by the current study. The RWQCB <br /> developed the 100 ppm level to help prioritize cases, not as a cleanup level. The level <br /> of cleanup is determined by assessing the potential for soil contamination to impact <br /> groundwater. <br /> .4.3 GROUNDWATER ANALYSES <br /> f Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells (MW-1, MW-2, and MW- <br /> 3B). Analytical results revealed gasoline, BTEX, and total recoverable hydrocarbons <br /> were below detection levels in all three wells. The results of the laboratory analyses <br /> are in Appendix E. <br /> r t i 5.0 CQNrJM <br /> NS <br /> , t <br /> z <br /> j . Concentrations of hydxacarbons.in the°.ater.samples collected from MW-Ij MW-2. - <br /> and MW-3B were below detection hmi.s. Therefore, Clayton recommends that semi- <br /> annual groundwater monitoring be conducted of monitoring well MW-3B at the site for one year to monitor any changes, <br /> The newly installed monitoring well MW-3B detected 770 mg/kg total recoverable <br /> hydrocarbons in soils at 4 feet bgs, and 20 mg/kg at 9.feet bgs. A limited shallow soil <br /> . boring program to define the horizontal and vertical extant of contamination may be <br /> Lj ; required by the SJCPI-IS along the abandoned leach line.' <br /> r <br /> S � <br /> -4- <br /> 32fA9-Imp <br /> I <br /> r� <br /> j <br /> i <br /> - <br /> iiw' 3 f aV F <br /> ti <br /> 06-pips Hl R1 I IN <br />