Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment A:Previous Environmental Activities <br /> down gradient of the site. The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> (RWQCB)reviewed the work plan, and in a November 2003 letter to Chevron <br /> Environmental Management Company requested further lateral and vertical delineation <br /> of soil and groundwater beyond what was proposed in the work plan. Therefore, SAIC <br /> also collected seven shallow soil samples (HR-1 through HR-7) in the vicinity of the <br /> former pipeline, the former blow-off pond, the former above-ground storage tanks ' <br /> (ASTs), the former boiler house, and near previous boring TS-07 near the southern site <br /> boundary. <br /> Detectable concentrations of TPHc ranged from 71 mg/kg in soil sample HR-1 to <br /> 930 mg/kg in soil sample HR-4. The highest TPHc concentration was from a sample <br /> collected in the proximity of the former pipeline near previous boring TS-15, down ' <br /> gradient of the former pump station. BTEX compounds were not reported in the seven <br /> soil samples submitted for analyses. PAHs were detected in each of the seven shallow <br /> soil samples; the highest reported concentrations were detected in HR-4. Detectable ' <br /> concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene were reported in four of the seven soil samples and <br /> ranged from 0.001 mg/kg in HR-1 to 0.016 mg/kg in HR-4. Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene was <br /> not reported at or above the laboratory detection limits. <br /> To confirm whether the affected soil in boring SB-3 was a result of residual petroleum , <br /> observed on site, SAIC collected one soil sample at 11 feet bgs for fuel-fingerprint <br /> analysis. The soil sample was submitted to Chevron Energy Technology Company under , <br /> SAIC chain-of-custody protocol. The results of the analysis indicated the sample <br /> contained a hydrocarbon most likely to be weathered crude oil typical of San Joaquin <br /> Valley crude oil and bunker fuels refined from San Joaquin Valley crude oil. ' <br /> SAIC collected grab groundwater samples from 12 of the 13 soil borings, and collected <br /> one depth-discrete groundwater sample from SB-13 to evaluate the vertical extent of <br /> dissolved-petroleum constituents beneath the site. TPHg were not detected at or above ' <br /> the reporting limit in 12 of the 13 grab groundwater samples. TPHg were detected at a <br /> concentration of 420 µg/L in the grab groundwater sample from boring SB-3, down <br /> gradient of the former pump station. TPHd were detected above the reporting limit in , <br /> seven of the 13 grab groundwater samples. The TPHd ranged from 86 µg/L in a grab <br /> groundwater sample from SB-7 to 260,000 Itg/L in a grab groundwater sample from <br /> SB-3. BTEX compounds were not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limits in ' <br /> any of the grab groundwater samples. <br /> PAHs were detected at or above the laboratory reporting limits in 10 of the 12 <br /> groundwater samples analyzed. The highest concentration of PAHs was reported in a , <br /> grab groundwater sample from SB-3, down gradient of the former pump station. Two <br /> grab groundwater samples from SB-8 and SB-12 were analyzed for total dissolved solids <br /> (TDS), which ranged from 2,800 milligrams per liter(mg/L)to 2,200 mg/L,respectively. ' <br /> As part of the investigation, SAIC located and sampled an on-site water supply well <br /> (DW-1) to determine if dissolved-petroleum constituents were affecting groundwater ' <br /> pumped from DW-1. BTEX, TPHg, TPHd, and PAHs were not detected at or above the <br /> reporting limits. TDS and nitrate were reported at 1,300 mg/L and 2.81 mg/L, <br /> respectively. <br />