Laserfiche WebLink
Sal Excavation and Second Quarter Post-Treatment Monitoring and Sampling Report 7 <br /> • The Southland Corporation,Store#20304,455 Grant Line Road,Tracy,CA June 9,1998 <br /> 5.2 Monitoring Well Sampling and Analytical Results <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from wells MW-4,MW-5,and newly installed well MW-16 Before <br /> sampling, at least four well-casing volumes of groundwater was removed from each monitonng well, unless <br /> the well was purged dry Field measurements of temperature,conductivity, and pH were recorded during <br /> well purging The groundwater samples were collected using disposable bailers and placed in <br /> analysts-specific sample containers with analysis-specific preservatives The samples were then sealed <br /> and labeled with the fob identification number,the sample number,date,time, and type of laboratory <br /> analysis required The samples were stored on ice in an insulated container and transported under <br /> chain-of-custody manifest to Core Laboratories, in Anaheim, California The groundwater samples were <br /> analyzed for BTF_X,MTBE and TPH-G using Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) methods <br /> 8020/modified 8015,and for oxygenates MTBE,TBA, DIPE, ETBE, and TAME using EPA method 8260 <br /> Groundwater purged during the second quarter monitoring and sampling event was placed in Department <br /> of Transportation (DOT)-approved drums and left on site pending transportation and disposal at a licensed <br /> facility <br /> Dissolved benzene and TPH-G were detected in groundwater samples from well MWA 6 at concentrations <br /> of 730 microgram per Iter(pg/L) and 13,000 pg/L, respectively(Figure 3) Using EPA method 8260, <br /> dissolved MTBE was not reported in any well above detection limits TBA, DIPE, ETBE, and TAME were <br /> not detected in any wells Analytical results from the groundwater samples collected on May 15, 1998 are <br /> • presented in Table 2,and historical analytical results are summarized in Table 2A The laboratory <br /> analytical reports and the chain-of-custody records for this sampling event are included in Appendix D <br /> 6 0 CONCLUSION AND CLOSURE ABSTRACT <br /> On April 28,29, and 30, f=lour Daniel GTI supervised the excavation of approximately 270 cubic yards of <br /> hydrocarbon impacted sod northeast(downgradient) of the former UST pit and beneath the former fuel <br /> dispenser island (Figure 2) Groundwater monitoring wells MW-8, MW-9,MW-10,and groundwater <br /> extraction well GWE-3 located within the excavation area were properly destroyed prior to the excavation <br /> activities On May 8, 1998,groundwater monrtonng well MW-16 was installed in the excavation northeast of <br /> the former UST pit to replace monitoring wells MW-8,MW-9, and MWA 0 <br /> Soil analytical results from the recent excavation and from previous site investigations indicate that the <br /> vertical and lateral extend of the soil hydrocarbon plume beneath the site has been defined Benzene and <br /> TPH-G have not been detected below a depth of 8 feet BGS in any of the soil samples collected at the site <br /> with the exception of a sample collected in 1990 from groundwater extraction well GWE-1 at 15 feet BGS <br /> which contained a benzene concentration of 0 0006 mg/kg (Table 1) Historical data indicate that the sod <br /> hydrocarbon plume extends laterally from the former UST pit and dispenser island northeast <br /> (downgradient)to the approximate location of well MW-5 <br /> iThe current dissolved hydrocarbon plume beneath the site extends laterally from the former UST pit and <br /> dispenser island northeast(downgradient)to well MWA and the former location of well MWA 0 <br /> FLUOR DANIEL GTI <br /> 20301ex.rpf <br />