Laserfiche WebLink
v v <br /> CONESTOGA-ROVERS <br /> &ASSOCIATES <br /> February 17,2010 Reference No. 241661 <br /> The purpose of this comparison is to demonstrate that it is unlikely that MTBE would migrate a <br /> distance of 400 feet and not show more degradation than one order of magnitude. And <br /> demonstrating this would suggest that the MTBE detected in Shell's well MW-10 (located <br /> 400 feet from the subject site)is not likely to be related to the release at the Shell site. <br /> The data from the 7-Eleven site and the 3011 West Benjamin Holt Drive site show that MTBE <br /> concentrations typically attenuate to low levels at distances of less than 250 feet,and in some <br /> cases (the 7-Eleven site) in less than 100 feet. <br /> Analysis of the soil types beneath the Shell site and the 7-Eleven site indicate they are similar,so <br /> it is reasonable to assume that the degradation of MTBE from the Shell release would occur as it <br /> did with the MTBE plume from the 7-Eleven site. Soil types beneath the 3011. West Benjamin <br /> Holt Drive site were similar but contained more coarse-grained soil. <br /> The 7-Eleven site had a significantly larger gasoline release than the Shell site with initial MTBE <br /> concentrations as high as 610,000µg/L. Similar to the Shell site,MTBE was the primary <br /> constituent of concern for the 7-Eleven site. The 7-Eleven plume migrated between 75 and <br /> 90 feet downgradient of the 7-Eleven site and within this distance declined in concentration by 3 <br /> orders of magnitude. It is reasonable to assume that the Shell plume (which was a lower <br /> concentration release)would attenuate in a similar manner to the 7-Eleven plume,or perhaps <br /> even in a shorter distance. If this were the case,then the Shell plume would attenuate beneath <br /> the east-bound lane of Interstate 205, and not be detectable on the northern side of Interstate <br /> 205. <br /> Since it is not possible to install monitoring wells within the Interstate 205 right of way,we <br /> cannot properly verify the distance the Shell plume has migrated north of the site. Shell's offsite <br /> well MW-10 was installed north of the site on the northern side of Interstate 205 (400 feet <br /> downgradient of the Shell site). Based on the attenuation of the nearby 7-Eleven MTBE plume, <br /> it is not reasonable to conclude that the MTBE detected in MW-10 originates from the Shell site. <br /> It is likely that the MTBE detected in well MW-10 is from a release that occurred offsite in the <br /> immediate vicinity of MW-10. <br /> Based on the information and analysis presented above,we request that the EHD and <br /> CVRWQCB reconsider the Shell environmental case for closure. <br /> Worldwide Engineering.Environmental,Construction,and IT Services <br />