Laserfiche WebLink
1 � <br /> o <br /> 1 <br /> A S S O C I ATES INC <br /> 1 Level of protection of human health and the environment <br /> 2 Reduction of toxicity,mobility and volume of contaminants <br /> 3 Compliance with regulatory guidelines <br /> 4 Cost effectiveness/public benefit <br /> 5 Short term effectiveness <br /> 6 Long term effectiveness <br /> 7 Implementability <br /> 1 8 Regulatory and community acceptance <br /> 1 5_1 Human Health Risk Assessment Study <br /> ♦ Criterion 1 <br /> ' This alternative will tell us the risk to human health based on certain site-specific criteria <br /> Since this alternative is modeling conditions at the site, it does nothing directly to change <br /> the level of protection <br /> 4 1 ♦ Criterion 2 <br /> This alternative leaves the contaminants in place and does not actively remediate impacted <br /> soil and groundwater There would be a reduction of the toxicity and volume of <br /> contaminants over time as biodegradation occurs The mobility of the contaminants would <br /> not be reduced <br /> 1 ♦ Criterion 3 <br /> This alternative would not immediately remediate soil or groundwater to concentrations <br /> ' acceptable to regulatory agencies If the modeling shows that the risk to human health and <br /> the environment is low, allowing petroleum products to remain in the subsurface may be an <br /> 1 acceptable alternative to the regulatory agencies <br /> ♦ Criterion 4 <br /> 1 The cost of this alternative is estimated to be approximately $5,000 and does not include the <br /> costs to overdrill the groundwater monitoring wells <br /> 1 ♦ Criterion 5 <br /> This alternative is not effective in the short term Exposure to humans by contamination <br /> releases to the air due to dust, or through ingestion or dermal exposure to impacted soil or <br /> 1 groundwater is minimal during groundwater monitoring and well destruction activities but <br /> is otherwise nonexistent for this alternative so short term effectiveness is not a factor <br /> 1 ♦ Criterion 6 <br /> The long term effectiveness of this alternative is acceptable This alternative would <br /> determine the toxicity and risk by evaluating various scenarios and possible decisions and <br /> w 1625001reports\CAP doe 6 <br /> 1 <br />