Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> GEOMATRIX <br /> TPHg are100 micrograms per liter(pg/l-)and 5 pg/L,respectively,and are based on taste and odor <br /> thresholds for dnnkmg water(Table 4) <br /> With the exception of the June 2004 groundwater sampling event and the initial sampling of well <br /> MW-1,groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells located dust outside of the area of <br /> petroleum affected soil(MW-1,MW-5, and MW-6) are not reported by the laboratory to have <br /> ' contained concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents above analytical reporting limits <br /> Upgradient monitoring well MW-1 was sampled a total of 15 times between the period of August <br /> ' 1998 to June 2002 Groundwater samples collected from this well are not reported to have shown <br /> any detections of TPHd,TPHg,or BTEX with the exception that TPHd was reported as detected at a <br /> ' concentration of 66 gg/L in the samples collected in August 1998 Similarly,groundwater samples <br /> collected from downgradient wells MW-5 and MW-6 between June 2000 and June 2002 (nine <br /> ' sampling events)were not reported to have shown detections of TPHd,TPHg,or BTEX Laboratory <br /> results from June 2004 do report the detections of TPHd in groundwater samples from monitoring <br /> wells MW-1,MW-5,and MW-6(at concentrations of 59,250,and 170 gg/l r ectrvely)Towever, <br /> ' groundwater samples from these wells collected in August 2004 were reported not to contain <br /> detectable concentrations of TPHd,TPHg, or BTEX Based on the historical results,the June 2004 <br /> results are considered anomalous(See Table 3)-- <br /> Deeper monitoring well MW-7 was sampled for the first time in June 2004 and results indicated the <br /> presence of TPHd(520 pg/L)and toluene(0 63 gg/L) However,the August 2004 analytical results <br /> indicated no detectable TPHd,TPHg, or BTEX Therefore the June 2004 results for MW-7 are also <br /> ' considered anomalous The vertical extent of TPH in groundwater at the site is therefore considered <br /> constrained by both the results of groundwater samples collected from MW-7 and by reported <br /> ' analytical results from grab groundwater samples collected at depths of up to approximately 50 feet <br /> bgs in boring SB 12 (Tables 2 and 3) <br /> 1 2.3 PRODUCT REMOVAL <br /> Free phase petroleum has been sporadically observed in monitoring well MW-2, located within the <br /> backfill of the former tank excavation Free product was removed from MW-2 on August 30,2004 <br /> using a bailer until no product remained in the well A total of 0 1 liter of product was removed <br /> iFollowing product removal,a"petro trap"was installed in MW-2 to passively collect free product <br /> The"petro trap"was checked on September 14,2004 and a total of approximately 0 1 liter of product <br /> had accumulated and was removed The"petro trap"is currently installed in MW-2 and will continue <br /> to be checked on a monthly basis <br /> } <br /> ' I Toc_Safe19000s199631CAPNCAP txt doe 4 <br />