Laserfiche WebLink
Kevin E. Dyer • -3- 15 February 2011 <br /> ' Former Pipelines, Tracy <br /> encountered in B-77. As such, depth discrete sampling performed further out <br /> laterally and deeper than where groundwater pollution has previously been detected <br /> offers the best strategy for delineating the plume northeast of Area 3. <br /> 2. The Work Plan states that a risk assessment will be prepared consistent with the <br /> 6 November 2009 Risk Assessment Scope of Work. Central Valley Water Board <br /> staff's 2 February 2010 letter provided comments on this document. The proposed <br /> Risk Assessment must incorporate these comments as well as the discussions from <br /> our 2 February 2011 meeting, during which we discussed strategies for preparing <br /> risk assessments at Shell pipeline sites in this area.. <br /> By 4 March 2011, please update us on whether the investigation can proceed as <br /> planned or will be delayed by the crop harvesting schedule. <br /> If you have any questions regarding this letter, you may contact me at (916) 464-4811 <br /> or by email at betaylor aterboards.ca.gov. <br /> Brian <br /> Engineering G logist <br /> cc: Mr. Jeff aarder, Conestoga Rovers & Associates, Sonoma <br /> Mr. Mike Infurna, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department, Stockton <br /> Ms. Eileen Nottoli, Allen Matkins Leck Gamble & Mallory LLP, San Francisco <br /> Mr. Shailendra Ganna, Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc., Houston, TX <br /> Mr. Hal Beral, Golden State Developers, Walnut Creek <br />