Laserfiche WebLink
GROUND ZERO ANALYSIS, INC. ' <br /> 1714 Main Street <br /> Escalon, California 95320-1927 <br /> Telephone (209)838-9888 <br /> Facsimile (209)838-9883 <br /> APR 2 3 2003 <br /> April 22, 2003 <br /> ENVIRONMENT HEALTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Mr Harlin Knoll <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> Subject First Quarter 2003 Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Knowles Property, 1140 W Hammer Lane, Stockton, CA <br /> Dear Mr Knoll <br /> This report summarizes activities at the subject site (Figure 1) during the first quarter 2003 Activities <br /> conducted during the reporting period included monitoring depth to water in all site wells, purging and <br /> sampling all site wells, analyzing the samples for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes (BTEX), and <br /> total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) <br /> SITE ACTIVITIES <br /> Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br /> An experienced Ground Zero technician measured the depth to groundwater in each site well on February 10, <br /> 2003 The depth to groundwater beneath the site ranged from 33 83 feet below the tops of the well casings <br /> (btoc) in well MW3 to 35 47 feet btoc in well MW2 Groundwater elevations in site wells rose an average of <br /> 3 0 feet between November 12, 2002 and February 10, 2003 The water table beneath the site lies above the <br /> screened intervals in wells MW4 and MW5 Groundwater flow was generally toward the east with a <br /> calculated gradient of 0 0018 feet per foot, or approximately 9 4 feet per mile A ti et surface map <br /> for February 10, 2003 is presented on Figure 2 Monitoring well construction details are summarized in Table <br /> 1 Groundwater monitoring data are summarized in Table 2 <br /> A Ground Zero technician purged a minimum of three well casing volumes of groundwater from monitoring <br /> wells MW1, MW3, MW4 and MW5 on February 10, 2003 Temperature, specific conductance, and pH were <br /> measured and recorded during the purging process All downhole equipment was decontaminated prior to and <br /> between each use by washing with a solution of laboratory-grade detergent and then double-rinsing with water <br /> Groundwater samples were collected using dedicated disposal bailers after physical parameters stabilized, and <br /> water levels recovered to at least 80%of pre-purged levels The samples were decanted into 40-m1 glass vials <br /> preserved with dilute hydrochloric acid Subsequently the samples were placed in an ice chest refrigerated to a <br /> temperature of approximately 4°C <br /> r <br /> G1GROi3NDZEIKNOWLES HAMIREPORTSIQ1,ARMQM2003 doc <br />