My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002075
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1120
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545244
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002075
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 10:39:37 AM
Creation date
1/30/2020 8:56:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002075
RECORD_ID
PR0545244
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0024606
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER KNOWLES STATION
STREET_NUMBER
1120
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
07749027
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1120 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Feasibility Study Report <br /> 1140 W Hammer Gane,SfocAton, CA <br />' monitonng and maintenance <br />' Criterion 2 Compliance with ARARs <br /> This treatment alternative is commonly employed at sites with coarse-grained soils and, therefore, <br />' would generally meet ARARs <br /> Criterion 3 Long-term effectiveness <br /> The long term effectiveness of this alternative groundwater extraction is dependent upon the degree <br />' of removal of residual contamination Based upon the presence of soil and groundwater <br /> contamination within relatively fine-grained soils at the site, it is doubtful that all residual <br />' contamination could be removed through groundwater extraction Any residual contamination <br /> remaining after the system can no longer effectively remove contaminants would be reduced <br /> through natural bioremediation <br />� . Criterion 4Re_duction of toxicity, mobility, or volume through treatment <br /> Groundwater extraction generally will reduce the level of toxicity, mobility and volume of <br /> contaminants in the soil by slowing or stopping the migration of groundwater in the contaminated <br /> zone Based upon the presence of soil and groundwater contamination within relatively fine- <br /> grained soils at the site, it is doubtful that contaminants would be reduced to levels acceptable to <br /> regulatory agencies solely through this alternative Any residual contamination remaining after the <br />' system can no longer effectively remove contaminants would be reduced through natural <br /> bioremediation <br /> Criterion 5 Short-term effectiveness <br />' This alternative should result in demonstrably lower dissolved contaminant concentrations and act to <br /> retard plume migration fairly soon after the system is operating <br /> Criterion 6 Implementability <br /> This alternative has some minor problems with implementation due to the time involved in <br /> obtaining permits From the APCD, as well as City and County agencies Permitting could take as <br /> much as 1$4 days dependent upon response from the appropriate agencies <br /> G IUumIGROUNDZL\KNO\VM%HAM\RLPoitTSIrcnvihilityRcpoit dog <br /> I14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.