My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002075
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1120
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545244
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002075
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 10:39:37 AM
Creation date
1/30/2020 8:56:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002075
RECORD_ID
PR0545244
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0024606
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER KNOWLES STATION
STREET_NUMBER
1120
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
07749027
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1120 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> TABLE 9 <br />' POTENTIAL REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES <br /> Knowles Property <br /> 1140 W. Hammer Lane, Stockton, CA <br />' Method Estimated I Estimated Comments <br /> Duration-L-- Cost <br /> Soil Remediation <br />' The deep soil between 30-50 feet is now saturated Current depth t <br /> Deep Excavation Several $300,000- water is 30 feet Clam shell excavator is expensive and requires <br /> Months $400,000+ special permitting Would require extensive shoring Technically <br /> and economically infeasible <br /> Soil Vapor $300,000- Affected soil now saturated Would require dewatering, which would <br /> Extraction 22? Years $400,000+ add significantly to the cost Technically and economically <br /> infeasible <br />' Natural Attenuation Unknown $15,000- Generally takes many years Estimated costs are for confirmation <br /> $30,000 bona s <br /> Groundwater Remediation <br />' Very inefficient process, requires high energy consumption, <br /> disruptive to site with installation of treatment system, technically <br /> Groundwater Pump 2-7 years $300,000- difficult to remove all contaminated groundwater due to adherence <br /> and Treat $500,000+ to soil particles Would necessarily be followed by groundwater <br /> monitoring ($4,000-$8,000 per year) for an undetermined number of <br /> ears <br /> • Same as above Sparging can theoretically help to drive <br /> Groundwater Pump contaminations from groundwater into vapor phase where vapors <br /> and Treat with Air 22? years $300,000- are extracted and destroyed Vapor extraction aspect may be <br /> Sparging $500,000+ infeasible due to fine-grained sods Would necessarily be followed <br /> by groundwater monitoring ($4,000-$8,000 per year) for an <br /> undetermined number of years <br /> Passive ORC Designed to enhance natural bioremediation Will not likely <br /> added to 3-5 years $50,000- remediate entire plume Somewhat unproven technology Would <br /> monitoring wells $70,000 necessarily be followed by groundwater monitoring ($4,000-$8,000 <br /> per year) for an undetermined number of years <br />' Active ORC Designed to enhance natural bioremediation Would involve drilling <br /> infected through 1-2 years $30,000- more soil borings on site Somewhat unproven technology Would <br /> soil borings $50,000 necessarily be followed by groundwater monitoring ($4,000-$8,000 <br /> per year) for an undetermined number of years <br /> Monitored Natural $4,000 <br /> Attenuation Unknown $8,000 per Passive remediation approach Requires long term monitoring <br /> ear <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.