My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002078
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1120
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545244
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002078
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 10:12:19 AM
Creation date
1/30/2020 8:58:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002078
RECORD_ID
PR0545244
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0024606
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER KNOWLES STATION
STREET_NUMBER
1120
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
07749027
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1120 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr Harlin Knoll <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> Monitoring wells MW1, MW2, MW3, MW4, MW5, and MW8 were purged a minimum of three <br /> well casing volumes of water and sampled on August 6, 2001 During the purging process <br /> temperature, specific conductance, and pH of the water were measured and recorded <br /> Groundwater samples were collected after the physical parameters stabilized and placed in an ice <br /> chest cooled to a temperature of at approximately 4°C for transport to Argon Laboratories <br /> (ELAP #2359) under chain of custody protocol The samples were analyzed for the presence of <br /> TPHg and BTEX utilizing EPA methods 8015M and 8020, respectively Purged groundwater <br /> was contained in labeled Department of Transportation (DOT) approved drums pending disposal <br /> Copies of field purge Iogs and water level measurements are included in Attachment A <br /> Groundwater Analytical Results <br /> Elevated levels of dissolved gasoline constituents were detected in the groundwater sample <br /> collected from well MW5 and low levels were detected in the sample collected from well MW 1 <br /> TPHg and BTEX constituents were not detected in the samples collected from wells MW2, MW3 <br /> MW4 or MW8 <br /> Well MW5 contained TPHg at a concentration of 35,000 parts per billion (ppb), benzene at 4,100 <br /> ppb, toluene at 860 ppb, ethylbenzene at 300 ppb, and xylenes at 2,600 ppb Well MW1 <br /> contained TPHg at a concentration of 180 ppb, benzene at 2 5 ppb, ethylbenzene at 3 2 ppb, and <br /> xylenes at 0 7 ppb Analytical results are summarized in Table 3 Laboratory data sheets and <br /> chain of custody documentation are included in Attachment B Figure 3 presents a benzene <br /> isoconcentration map from the most recent analytical results and Attachment C contains graphical <br /> representations of TPHg and benzene concentrations over time in site wells <br /> Well Destruction Activities <br /> On September 25, 2001, Mr Sean Garvey of Ground Zero and Mr Harlin Knoll of San Joaquin <br /> County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) observed Spectrum <br /> Exploration, Inc (Spectrum, C57-512268) destroy wells MW6, MW7, and MW8 The wells <br /> were destroyed pursuant to the August 9, 2001 workplan prepared by Ground Zero, which was <br /> approved by Mr Knoll A letter report detailing well destruction activities was submitted to <br /> PHS/EHD under separate cover <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> • Concentrations of dissolved TPHg and BTEX in wells MW1 and MW5 have been gradually <br /> declining since their recorded highs BTEX constituents in well MW5 have declined by 90-97% <br /> since December 1996 Contaminant concentrations in well MW1 have decreased more than 97% <br /> from the recorded highs in that well <br /> • The consistently low levels of petroleum hydrocarbon constituents detected in well MW 1 <br /> coupled with the absence of contaminants in wells MW4 and MW2 suggest that well MW 1 is <br /> located at the approximate southeastern extent of the dissolved contaminant plume <br /> Knowles h-m/reports/3gm2001 doe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.