My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0013101
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1767
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545247
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0013101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 1:43:00 PM
Creation date
1/30/2020 11:13:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0013101
RECORD_ID
PR0545247
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009790
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF STOCKTON FIRE STATION #7
STREET_NUMBER
1767
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
07509036
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1767 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L <br /> City o,f Stockton A68107.01B <br /> LJuly 1A 1997 Page 11 <br /> • TPH-D was detected at 72µg/L in a groundwater sample collected from beneath the <br /> former UST location. This concentration is below the odor and taste threshold of <br /> 100,ug/L recommended by the U.S. EPA; <br /> L • Based on the the fact that BTEX constituents were not detected in groundwater <br /> above the minimum contaminant level and TPH-D was detected at concentrations <br /> below the odor and taste threshold, further investigation and/or remedial action for <br /> Lgroundwater does not appear to be warranted at this time. <br /> L 8.0 <br /> L • Copies of this report should be forwarded to SJCPHS for review and comment. <br /> ! 9.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> L Finding and recommendations presented in this report are based on the assumption that <br /> subsurface conditions and chemical concentrations do not deviate from those disclosed in <br /> L., the field and laboratory testing. If variations from these findings are found, Twining should <br /> be notified so that supplemental conclusions and recommendations may be provided. <br /> LThe purpose of a geologic/hydrogeologic study is to reasonably characterize existing site <br /> conditions based on the geology/hydrogeology of the area. In performing such a study, it <br /> L is understood that a balance must be struck between a reasonable inquiry into the site <br /> conditions and an exhaustive analysis of each conceivable environmental characteristic. No <br /> investigation is thorough enough to describe all geologic/hydrogeologic conditions of interest <br /> Lat a given site. <br /> Environmental conditions may exist at the site that cannot be identified by visual <br /> Lobservation. Where subsurface work is performed, our professional opinions are based in <br /> part on interpretation of data from discrete sampling locations that may not represent actual <br /> conditions at unsampled locations. If conditions are not identified during the study, such <br /> La finding should not be construed as a guarantee of the absence of such conditions at the <br /> site,but rather as the result of the services performed within the scope, limitations, and cost <br /> of the work performed. <br /> L The work waserformed for the sole use of Twinin 's client an r <br /> p g d appropriate regulatory <br /> Lagencies. Any reliance on this report by a third party is at such party's sole risk. <br /> Twining's professional services were performed, findings obtained, and recommendations <br /> Lprepared in accordance with generally-accepted engineering principles and practices in San <br /> L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.