My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0013105
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARBOR
>
1805
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545253
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0013105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 3:09:16 PM
Creation date
1/30/2020 11:28:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0013105
RECORD_ID
PR0545253
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009191
FACILITY_NAME
PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN
STREET_NUMBER
1805
STREET_NAME
HARBOR
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14502005
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1805 HARBOR RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE OF CONTENTS <br /> Page <br /> I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................1 <br /> 2. BACKGROUND ......... —...—.......................................................-........ ................... <br /> 3. SITE CONDITIONS............................................................................................................4 <br /> 3.1 Occurrence and Distribution of Detected TPH for Soil Samples............................5 <br /> 3.2 Occurrence and Distribution of Detected TPH for Water Samples.........................5 <br /> 3.3 Product Removal................................................*.......*..............—..............*.............9 <br /> 3.4 Potential for Migration Surface Water and Drinking Water Impacts......................9 <br /> 3.5 Human Health Risks...........1.—I. <br /> 4. CORRECTIVE ACTION OBJECTIVE............................................................................16 <br /> 5. CORRECTIVE ACTION ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION ........................................16 <br /> 5.1 Alternative Al: Excavation of soils containing 500 mg/kg TPH or more.............16 <br /> 5.2 Alternative A2: Excavation with Limited Vertical Extent (5 feet into the <br /> WaterTable) ................................:......................................................... ...........17 <br /> 5.3 Alternative A3: Extend excavation laterally to MW-3 and vertically extend to <br /> adepth of 28 feet.....................................................................................................18 <br /> 6. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................19 <br /> 7. REFERENCES .....................................:............................................................................22 <br /> FIGURES <br /> Figure I Site Location Map................ ................-............................... ...... .................... 2 <br /> Figure2 Site Layout Map.......-.............................................................................................3 <br /> Figure 3 Site Plan with Groundwater Results........................................................................8 <br /> TABLES <br /> TableI Site Chronology.........................:.............................................................................4 <br /> Table 2 Soil Sample Results ...............::................................................................................6 <br /> Table 3 Grab Groundwater Analytical Results.:.................................................................10 <br /> Table 4 Groundwater Analytical Results............................................................................11 <br /> Table 5 ESLs Compared to Site Conditions.......................................................................15 <br /> Table 6 WQO's Compared to Site Conditions....................................................................15 <br /> Table 7 Comparison of Remedial Alternatives...................................................................21 <br /> APPENDICES <br /> Appendix A Alternative Al Detailed Maps and Cost Analysis <br /> Appendix B Alternative A2 Detailed Maps and Cost Analysis <br /> Appendix C Alternative A3 Detailed Maps and Cost Analysis <br /> i <br /> K:ICO'N'T'GRAN\StocktonlCAP\CAP ADDENDUM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.