Laserfiche WebLink
Up gradient monitoring well MW-1 was sampled a total of 15 times between August 1998 and June <br /> 2002, and TPHd was only detected, at a concentration of 66 µg/L, in the samples collected in August <br /> 1998. <br /> No other sampling events detected the presence of TPHd, TPHg, or BTEX in MW-1. Similarly, <br /> groundwater samples collected during nine sampling events from downgradient wells MW-5 and MW- <br /> 6 between June 2000 and June 2002 did not detect TPHd,TPHg,or BTEX. <br /> Additional ground water sampling from June 2004 detected TPHd in groundwater samples from <br /> monitoring wells MW-1, MW-5, and MW-6(at concentrations of 59, 250, and 170µg/1,respectively). <br /> However, groundwater samples collected from these wells in August and November/December 2004 <br /> contained no detectable concentrations of TPHd, TPHg, or BTEX using the silica gel preparation <br /> procedure. Based on the historical results, the June 2004 results are considered anomalous (See Table <br /> 3 and 4 for ground water results). <br /> Deeper monitoring well MW-7, placed east of the'former-UST excavation and screened at a depth of <br /> 30 to 35 feet,was sampled for the first time in June:2004. These results indicated the presence of TPHd <br /> (520µg/L) and toluene(0.63 µg/L). These results were not confirmed with the August 2004 analytical <br /> results indicating no detectable TPHd, TPHg, or BTEX. The November/December 2004 results <br /> reported the presence of TPHd(140 to 180µg/.L); however,when these samples were placed through a <br /> silica gel,no detectable TPHd concentrations were present. Tlus result indicates reported detections in <br /> these samples are non-petroleum biogenic material. <br /> The 2004 results for monitoring wells MW.-3.and MW-4 indicate TPHd concentrations increased <br /> between 2002 and 2004. The groundwater-gradient is flat in the area of MW-3 and MW-4 with a <br /> historical flow direction from MW-2 toward.the south and southwest according to previous quarterly <br /> reports (Haley and Aldrich, 2004, and ATC-2002). Any'material detected in MW-3 and MW4 is <br /> associated with the source area at MW-2. <br /> 3.3 Product Removal <br /> According to the CAP and previous reports; free phase petroleum has been sporadically observed in <br /> monitoring well MW-2, located within the backfill of the former tank excavation. First a sheen was <br /> observed in December 2000 and then a thin layer of 0.01 to 0.2 feet was observed between June 2001 <br /> through August 2004. In August 2004,.a petrwtrap was installed to collect any free product and to <br /> provide information regarding the characteristics-of the -free product. Measurable free phase <br /> petroleum is likely limited to the area of the-excavation backfill based upon the recovery of only 100 <br /> milliliters during recovery every two weeks in.September. A petro trap will continue to be monitored <br /> to further assess the presence of free product. <br /> 3.4 Potential for Migration,Surface Water and Drinking Water Impacts <br /> As discussed in the October 2004 CAP, petroleum constituents from a release from the former UST <br /> have been in direct contact with groundwater for.a minimum of at least 16 years, as the UST was <br /> removed in 1988. Groundwater analytical results indicate that petroleum analytes and constituents are <br /> only detected in samples collected from monitoring wells installed within affected soil. <br /> R.\CONTGRANIStockton\CAPICAP ADDENDUM <br />