Laserfiche WebLink
Groundwater elevation measurements from the.'monitoring wells indicate the magnitude of the <br /> horizontal hydraulic gradient at the site to be very'low (i.e., less than approximately 0.0001 feet per <br /> feet),with an apparent direction toward the south and southwest. <br /> Petroleum analytes or constituents generally are not detected in groundwater samples collected from <br /> monitoring wells located less than 100 feet down'gradient of the affected soil (MW-5 and MW-6). <br /> Therefore, the detections of TPHd in monitoring well MW-2, which is screened across petroleum <br /> affected soil, likely represents either petroleum entrained on soil particulates in groundwater(turbidity) <br /> or globules of petroleum collected with the groundwater sample and are not representative of dissolved <br /> phase petroleum. The TPH concentrations_ in MW-3 and MW-4 represent conditions at the <br /> soil/groundwater interface. <br /> Shallow groundwater within and downgradient of the petroleum affected soil is not currently used and <br /> is not anticipated to be used in the near future. A well survey was conducted by ATC in 2000 that <br /> searched Department of Water Resources (DWR)'files, performed a site and vicinity reconnaissance, <br /> and contacted the City of Stockton and'Califomia Water Service for wells within 2000 feet of the site <br /> vicinity(ATC 2000). According to ATC, the nearest well is located approximately 400 feet southeast <br /> of the site and is a monitoring well. The nearest well potentially used for drinking water is a domestic <br /> well located approximately 1,300 feet to fhe south "of the site. In addition, San Joaquin County <br /> Department of Public Health Services ordinances require a minimum of 50 foot sanitary seal at the top <br /> of any public water supply well. These sanitary:seal requirements would preclude shallow affected <br /> water at the site from future use as a source of.municipal water. The nearest surface water is the <br /> Stockton deepwater channel,located approximately+650 feet north of the site. <br /> The following is a summary of findings from*the October 2004 CAP: <br /> 1. The lateral extent of reported petroleum-telated detections in groundwater is limited to the <br /> vicinity of the petroleum-impacted area atld the volume is small. <br /> 2. No dissolved "plume" of petroleum affected groundwater associated with this petroleum- <br /> impacted area is present. <br /> 3. It is highly unlikely that this localized area of petroleum affected shallow groundwater will <br /> migrate beyond its current limited spatial extent given that the release occurred at least 16 years <br /> ago. <br /> 4. Shallow groundwater is not and likely will not be used directly as a source of drinking water. <br /> 5. Environmental impacts (e.g.,to groundwater supply wells or surface water bodies) outside the <br /> immediate area of the former USTIocation.are not likely to occur under current conditions. <br /> 3.5 Human Health Risks <br /> The October 2004 CAP identified the environmental screenij,g levels(Eels)applicable to the petroleum <br /> constituents detected at the Stockton Elevator. Table 5 compares the maximum concentrations of <br /> petroleum constituents detected in vadose zone soil to environmental screening levels (ESLs), The <br /> comparison below is of soil site conditions to ESL's for deep soils(>3m bgs)where groundwater is not <br /> a current or potential source of drinking water as applied to the Residential Land use screening levels. <br /> 14 <br /> RAC0NTGRAN\Stockton\CAP\CAP ADDENDUM <br />