Laserfiche WebLink
Soil results from 1998 at MW-2 indicated the presence of 14,000 mg/kg TPH at a depth of 20.5 <br /> feet bgs and 1,500 mg/kg TPH at a depth of 30 feet bgs. Appendix A provides cross sections of <br /> the areas to be removed, calculations of mass removal, and detailed cost estimates. <br /> The concentration of 1,500 mg/kg was the highest recorded concentration at a depth of 28 feet <br /> and this location coincided with the tank cavity location. Much of the area would only need <br /> excavation to 25 feet to remove the TPH concentrations targeted for this option. <br /> Depth to groundwater is approximately 1241.bgs. This excavation alternative would extend <br /> approximately 14 feet into the water table, and shoring would be required for the site. Given the <br /> proximity of the excavation to utility limes, railroad tracks, and the depth of the excavation, <br /> shoring becomes a necessity for this option and is estimated to cost an additional $85,000 to <br /> $95,000. <br /> An additional impediment to excavation is the 14 R by 20 R concrete pad, estimated to be 6 <br /> inches in thickness that is partially over the excavation area. Half of this pad will have to be <br /> removed to allow excavation. Costs for removing the concrete pad are estimated to be between <br /> $1,000 and $2,000. The power line and power pole that lay adjacent to the excavation area will <br /> also need to be removed for safety purposes.'.The cost of removing the power line and power <br /> poll is estimated to be between $2,000 and $2,500. <br /> The top 10 feet of soil is considered clean fill and would be stockpiled and re-used on site. Thus,of the <br /> 1,350 cubic yards removed, approximately,505 cubic yards are re-used and 850 cubic yards would be <br /> disposed of at an appropriate landfill facility. <br /> Ancillary operations needed to address soils below the water table include dewatering the excavation at <br /> a rate of 15 gpm, treating the water, and.discharging to the City of Stockton sewer system. By <br /> extending excavation into the water table,.additional costs will be incurred to dewater the site. It is <br /> estimated that dewatering will cost betweeti.$21,800 and$37,500. Extracted water will be piped to a <br /> treatment system consisting of one 2,000=pourid-carbon rant arranged in series, pumps, sand filter, <br /> holding tanks,water level controllers,piping and manifold. The treated water is to be discharged to a <br /> City sewer with appropriate permits. <br /> The costs for this alternative are estimated between-$254,000 and$299,000. Shoring costs of$85,000 <br /> to $90,000 represent almost 30 percent of the,cost of this option. This alternative would result in the <br /> removal of approximately 11,500 pounds'"of TPH material from the tank excavation area, which <br /> translates to a cost of between$22.44 and$26..23.per pound of TPH removed. <br /> 5.2 Alternative A2: Excavation with Limitbd Vertical Extent 5 Feet into the Water Table <br /> A second alternative considered removing the'contaminated soils occurring at the top of the <br /> water table and extending approximately five feet into the water table. This option extended to a <br /> larger area and included excavation from HA-8, HA-9, the utility pole, and then towards MW-3. <br /> Appendix B provides cross sections of the area to be removed, calculations of mass removed, <br /> and detailed cost estimates. This represents an area of 1,540 ftz compared to Alternative Al <br /> RXONrGRANIStocktonlCAMCAP ADDENDUM <br />