Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> E <br /> City of Stockton A68109 01B <br /> July 18, 1997 Page 3 <br /> of a soil sample collected at 12 feet beneath the UST did not detect petroleum product <br /> constituents (PPCs) at concentrations above the detection limit. <br /> In a request for bid letter dated February 8, 1996, the City of Stockton (City) requested a <br /> work plan for the project site to include four soil borings advanced by the direct push <br /> technique (soil probe) to depths of 25 feet BSG. In a letter dated March 21, 1996 the San <br /> Joaquin County Public Health Services (SJCPHS) suggested that soil borings be advanced <br /> to determine the vertical and horizontal extent of soil contamination. In addition, if soil <br /> ` contamination appears to extend to groundwater, the SJCPHS suggested that a groundwater <br /> sample be collected. The following sections outline the work performed to satisfy the <br /> request of the City and the suggestions of the SJCPHS. <br /> 4 4.0 INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES <br /> This soil and groundwater assessment consisted of: preparation of a work plan and <br /> appropriate permit applications, a field investigation, a laboratory testing program, and <br />{ L preparation of a summary report. Standard operating procedures (SOPS), relevant to the <br /> field and laboratory activities, are described in Appendix A. Any specific deviations from <br /> Cthe SOPS are stated in the following sections. <br /> L <br /> 4.1 Work Plan and Permit_Application Approval: The work scope herein described was <br /> presented in Twining's work plan (A68107.09A) dated May 29, 1996 (Twining, 1996). The <br /> work plan was approved by the SJCPHS in their letter dated October 11, 1996. An <br /> "Application for Well/Pump Permit" was submitted to the SJCPHS on August 14, 1996 and <br /> approved on November 1, 1996. Copies of the SJCPHS work plan approval and the <br /> approved permit application are attached in Appendix B. <br /> r .. <br /> 4.2 Field Investigation: The field investigation consisted of collecting sub-surface soil <br /> a <br /> and groundwater samples for chemical analysis. <br /> 4.2.1 Soil Sampling Technique and Locations: Subsurface soil samples were collected <br /> using a hydraulically-powered, soil probing machine that uses static force and percussion to <br /> advance small diameter sampling tools into subsurface soil for collecting soil cores. A <br /> i sampling tool (bore sampler) was attached to the leading end of a probe rod and driven into <br /> the subsurface using the machine. The sampling tool collected a continuous soil sample as <br /> it was advanced. The sampler advanced approximately 48 inches and then was recovered <br /> from the bore hole. The bore sample (soil sample) was extracted from the sampler. The <br /> soil sample was contained within a 2-inch diameter sampler liner of clear plastic. <br /> The soil samples were examined for the purpose of preparing lithologic logs. Soil <br /> descriptions were logged on a field boring log consistent with the Unified Soil Classification <br /> i System (USCS). The soil samples were field screened for evidence of volatile organic <br /> chemicals VOCs and/or other contaminates. The field screening consisted of; visual <br /> � (VOCs) / g <br /> i • <br /> t <br />