Laserfiche WebLink
o." .ate aun ci:ua rnA cua a45 u621 KLEINFELDER INC PHS/EHD IA004 <br /> 4 <br /> T:le results of the field and laboratory work were detailed in Kleinfelder's report titled "Report, <br /> P:e-Abandonment Underground Storage Tank Soil Assessment, (12,000 Gallon SC-250 and <br /> 1:,000 Gallon SS-1H USTs),Granite Construction Company, 10500 South Harlan Road, French <br /> Camp, California 95231" dated February 5, 1999. That report had the following conclusions <br /> w A recommendations: <br /> Unidentified extractable hydrocarbons (UEH) were detected in one soil sample and both water <br /> samples at concentrations only slightly above laboratory reporting levels. UEH was detected at <br /> 2.03 mg/kg in a soil sample collected in boring 134 at an approximate auger depth of 13% feet. <br /> The groundwater samples collected from borings B1 and B3 had reported UEH concentrations of <br /> 0.203 mg/L and 0.407 mg/L,respectively. All of the hydrocarbons detected were relatively dense <br /> (generally Cle to C34hydrocarbon range). <br /> The trace UEH concentrations found in the two "grab" groundwater samples likely resulted in <br /> cross contamination from the soils in the borehole above it. Also no analytes were detected in soil <br /> or groundwater from the custom fuel fingerprint analyses (SC-250 and SS-1H), which lends <br /> support to this conclusion. <br /> Based on the results of this assessment Kleinfelder has the following recommendations: <br /> 1) Kleinfelder does not recommend further soil/groundwater assessment or mitigation related to <br /> the two existing USTs. <br /> 2) Kleinfelder recommends UST abandonment in-place according to PHS/EHD guidelines. <br /> 3) Kleinfelder recommends the drilling-derived wastes be used as fill on site, following <br /> PHS/EHD approval to do so. <br /> 4) A copy of this report should be submitted to San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Department,Environmental Health Division(PHS/EHD)and the State of California, Central <br /> Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board(CVRWQCB)for their review and comment. <br /> -ROPOSED ABANDONMENT METHODOLOGY <br /> T he SS-1H and SC-250 USTs would be abandoned in place using the following methodology: <br /> 11 A permit to abandon each of the USTs in place would be filed with PHS/EHD. Please note <br /> that a PHS/EHD inspector may want to be present during abandonment. <br /> 21 The vent pipe for the SC-250 UST would be disconnected near the surface. The SS-1H tank <br /> does not appear to be vented. <br /> 31 Each 12,000 gallon tank would be pumped with a 2-sack sand/cement slurry (a.k.a. 2-sack <br /> mortar mix)until the mortar fills the tank and begins to flow from the disconnected vent pipe <br /> (SC-250 tank only) or until full and flowing from the fill neck. Preliminary calculations <br /> yield that each tank would require approximately 591/2 cubic yards of grout. <br /> 41 All unnecessary piping for the USTs would be removed,as practical. <br /> 51 Each UST would then be topped off with mortar to the top of the fill neck. <br /> 2)-1108.42.EO1 1201191,853 Page 3 of 4 <br /> Copyright 1999,Kleinfelder,Inc. September 27,1999 <br /> KLEINI=ELDER 2825 East Myrtle Street,Stockton,CA 95205-4794 (209)948-1345 (209)948-0621 fax <br />