Laserfiche WebLink
Work Plan for SVE/AS Feasibility Testing ,] E C ® R - _- <br /> ARCO Service Station 548 <br /> Stockton, California <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br /> SENSITIVE RECEPTORS <br /> A sensitive receptor survey was performed by SECOR in March 2006. According to the <br /> Environmental Data Resources Inc (EDR) database sensitive receptor survey report, there <br /> are twenty nine (29) water wells located within a one mile radius of the site <br /> (EDR, March 23, 2006). Two of these wells are located within a quarter mile of the site <br /> (SECOR, 2006). <br /> According to the Geotracker database (www.geotracker.swrcb.ca .gov) there are four water <br /> supply wells located in the vicinity of the site at an unknown distance. Two wells are owned <br /> by the City of Stockton and the other two wells are owned by the County of San Joaquin. <br /> In July 2004, URS Corporation (URS) conducted a file review at the Department of Water <br /> Resources (DWR) and City of Stockton Public Works Department (CSPWD) to identify <br /> wells within a radius of 2,000 feet from the site and a sensitive receptor survey to identify all <br /> potential receptors within a 500-foot radius. DWR records identified 12 domestic wells and <br /> two public groundwater production wells within a 2, 000-foot radius of the site. CSPWD <br /> identified one active production well within the 2,000400t radius . The production well is City <br /> Well # 1 , located approximately 950 feet south-southeast of the site. This well produces <br /> approximately 800 gallons per minute (gpm) and is screened at various intervals between <br /> 170 and 240 feet below ground surface (bgs). The sensitive receptor survey did not identify <br /> (, ) any surface water bodies , child-care centers, schools, or wildlife habitats within 500 feet of <br /> the site (URS , 2004). <br /> CHARACTERIZATION STATUS <br /> The site conceptual model prepared by URS (URS, 2004) assumed that the remaining <br /> hydrocarbon mass in soil was negligible. This assumption was based on historical soil <br /> analytical data , SVE system performance, and the rise in groundwater elevations . The only <br /> analytical data indicating that impacted soil was present above 30 feet was collected during <br /> the tank excavation in 1998. This data indicates that minor soil impacts existed in the old <br /> tank cavity, prior to remediation. SVE wells VW-5S and VW-513 were screened in and <br /> below the old tank cavity to remediate soil impacts in the area . These wells were calculated <br /> to have a radius of influence of 30 feet (URS , 2004). That radius of influence is large <br /> enough to allow VW-5S and VW-51) to remediate soil impacts in and around the tank cavity. <br /> In addition , depth to groundwater has increased from approximately 50 feet bgs to <br /> approximately 30 feet bgs since site investigations began in 1991 . This rise in groundwater <br /> elevations has effectively submerged the impacted soil at the site . The submersion of <br /> impacted soil has probably transferred contamination from soil to groundwater, effectively <br /> eliminating soil impacts above the former water table. Since SVE/AS operations have <br /> removed significant hydrocarbon mass from the site, and groundwater elevations have <br /> risen at least 20 feet, impacted soil is no longer considered to be significant to site <br /> conditions . <br /> Groundwater impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons is generally confined to the area of the <br /> UST complex. Non-detectable concentrations of hydrocarbons at MWA through MW-7 <br />