My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0001971
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1612
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545246
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0001971
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 8:43:21 PM
Creation date
1/30/2020 2:20:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0001971
RECORD_ID
PR0545246
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003611
FACILITY_NAME
PARKWOODS GAS & FOOD
STREET_NUMBER
1612
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
07728002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1612 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
x <br /> Mr Kyle Christie Project 0805-140 01 <br /> February 13, 1995 <br /> Page 2 <br /> In March 1992 EA Engineering, Science Technology (EA) observed removal of the oil-water <br /> separator/clarifier (EA Engineering, Science and Technology, August 1992, Report 80633 01). <br /> EA collected one soil sample from beneath the former oil-water separator and one sample from <br /> the concrete Analytical results from the soil samples indicated that oil grease (quantified as total <br /> oil and grease [TOG]) was present Concentration of volatile organic compounds, senu-volatile <br /> organic compounds, and polychlorinated biphenyls were below detection limits Total metals <br /> were also below detection hnuts with the exception of arsenic and barium which were detected <br /> at concentrations of 0 0051 and 012 parts per million, respectively(see Attachment A) <br /> On March 2, 1992, RESNA conducted a vapor extraction test at the site (RESNA, June 15, <br /> 1992, Report 300045) Results of the test indicated that soil beneath the site can be remediated <br /> by vapor extraction and the evaluated radius of influence was 30 feet <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING, FOURTH QUARTER 1994 <br /> Groundwater Technology, Inc , (GTI) Concord, California, was contracted by ARCO to <br /> conduct the old work at the site, GTI subsequently forwarded their field notes and the <br /> laboratory reports to EMCON Field work included measuring depths to water and collecting <br /> groundwater samples for subjective and laboratory analyses EMCON used these data to <br /> evaluate the direction and gradient of groundwater flow beneath the site <br />• On December 2, 1994, a technician from GTI measured the depth to water and collected <br /> groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW 1 through MW-6 for subjective and laboratory <br /> analyses The field methods and procedures used are presented m an Attachment A The <br /> technician did not observe floating product or product sheen on samples collected from the wells <br /> (see Table 1) <br /> The surveyed elevations of the top of casing and the depth to groundwater measurements <br /> (summarized in Table 1) were used to evaluate the potentiometric surface beneath the site On <br /> December 2, 1994, the direction of groundwater flow was toward the east with a gradient of <br /> approximately 0 003 (see Figure 3) The direction of groundwater flow Is consistent with <br /> previous sampling events Groundwater elevations increased approximately 0 83 foot from the <br /> previous sampling event(September 1994) <br /> Groundwater samples from each well were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as <br /> gasoline (TPHG), and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylene isomers (BTEX) using <br /> Environmental Protection Agency Methods 5030/DHS/LUFr and 5030/8020, respectively The <br /> samples were analyzed at National Environmental Testing, Inc , in Santa Rosa, Cahfornia. The <br /> results of these analyses are summarized in Table 1 Copies of the laboratory analysts reports are <br /> Attachment A <br /> Results of analyses indicated TPHG were detected in groundwater samples collected from wells <br />. MW-1 and MW-5 at a concentration of 60 parts per bdhon (ppb) and 2,200 ppb, respectively <br /> Benzene was detected at a concentration of 3 0 ppb (well MW-1) and 380 ppb (well MW-5) <br /> TPHG and BTEX were not detected in wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4 and MW-6 Concentrations <br /> of TPHG and benzene are shown on Figure 2 <br /> SAC 1N Ipl010805108051400 Ibm-951mam 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.