Laserfiche WebLink
_7 11FAMARAIR <br /> June 21, 1993 Working To Restore Nature <br />. ARCO Service Station No. 0548, Stockton. California <br /> Results of analyses are shown on Table 1. TPHg and benzene were detected at 39,000 ppm <br /> and 660 ppm, respectively. <br /> GROUND-WATER MONITORING <br /> Subjective Analysis and Water-L&vel MeasureMents <br /> On March 4, 1992, a technician from Emcon measured depths to water, performed <br /> subjective analyses of ground water, and collected ground-water samples from wells MW-2 <br /> 01. _ _ _ through MW-4 for laboratory analyses (MW-1 was inaccessible due to asphalt covering the <br /> wellhead). On March 26, 1993, a technician from RESNA measured the depth to water in <br /> well MW-5 and then developed the we11. Our technician also visited the site.on March 29, <br /> 1993, to measure the depth to water and collect.a ground-water sample from well MW-5 for <br /> laboratory analyses. No floating product or product sheen was noted in samples from the <br />• wells during the site visits (Table 2). Data obtained from Emcon is presented in the <br /> Appendix to this report. Our field methods are attached. <br /> The wellhead elevations of the monitoring wells at the site were previously surveyed by Tom <br /> O. Morrow of West Sacramento, California, a licensed land surveyor (California Land <br /> 0 Surveyors No.5161). Well MW-5 was also surveyed by Tom O. Morrow on March 22, 1993; <br /> due to different gauging dates this data was not used to construct this potentiometric map. <br /> The surveyed elevations and the depth-to-groundwater measurements (Table 2) were used <br /> to evaluate the potentiometric surface beneath the site. The ground-water flow direction <br /> on March 4, 1993, was generally to the east with a hydraulic gradient of 0.003 (Plate 15). <br /> • Ground-Water Sampling and Analyses <br /> Ground-water samples were analyzed for TPHg and BTEX using EPA Methods 5030 and <br /> 8020 and standard methods prescribed by the State of California. These samples were <br /> analyzed at Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. in San Jose, California (Hazardous Waste <br /> Testing Laboratory Certificate No. 1426). The ground-water sample collected from well <br /> ` MW-5 was submitted to Sequoia for analysis of TOG using Standard Method 5520 E&F, <br /> TPHg, and BTEX. The results of analyses are summarized in Table 2. Copies of the <br /> laboratory analysis reports are in the Appendix. <br /> • The results of analyses indicated that TPHg was detected in samples collected from wells <br /> MW-2 and MW-5 at concentrations of 57 and 930 parts per billion (ppb), respectively. <br /> TPHg was below laboratory detection limits in the remaining wells sampled. Benzene was <br /> detected at 16 ppb in well MW-5 but was not detected in wells MW-2, MW-3, and MW-4. <br /> The laboratory report indicates that the sample collected from wells MW-2 contains lower <br /> boiling point hydrocarbons which do not match typical gasoline fingerprints. The report also <br /> • <br /> 033lccar <br /> 30004-8 3 <br /> • <br />