Laserfiche WebLink
S E C ® R <br /> w <br /> • Ms Victoria McCartney <br /> March 24, 2005 <br /> Page 6 <br /> • Soil Analytical Results. Soil samples from MW-11 and MW-12 were collected at 5- <br /> foot intervals using a California modified split-spoon sampler Selected samples <br /> from each boring were sent under chain-of-custody procedures to Severn Trent <br /> Laboratories, Inc (STL) for analysts of gasoline range organics (GRO), BTEX, fuel <br /> oxygenates (MtBE, TAME, di-isopropyl ether [DIPE], ethyl tertiary butyl ether [EtBE], <br /> TBA), 1,2-dichloroethane [1,2-DCA], and ethylene dibromide [EDB] by EPA Method <br /> 8260B Results are presented in Table 2 Soil samples were inadvertently not <br /> analyzed for TPHd by—EPA Method-8015M, as requested by the SJCEHD in <br /> correspondence dated December 23, 2003 (Attachment 1) Procedures for soil <br /> sample collection are included in Attachment 3 The certified laboratory analytical <br /> report and chain-of-custody documentation are presented in Attachment 5 <br /> r <br /> • Well Development. The newly installed groundwater monitoring wells were <br /> developed on January 24, 2005 by Cascade under the supervision of SECOR <br /> personnel Each well was developed by surging the length of the screen interval <br /> and removing at least ten casing volumes of water Well development field data <br /> sheets are included in Attachment 6 <br /> ® ; <br /> Groundwater Analytical Results Groundwater monitoring wells were sampled <br /> after well development on January 24, 2005, and were submitted to STL for analysts <br /> of GRO, BTEX, fuel oxygenates (MtBE, TAME, DIPE, EtBE, TBA), 1,2-DCA, and <br /> EDB by EPA Method 82608 Results are presented in Table 3 The certified <br /> laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody documentation are included in <br /> Attachment 6 Samples will be collected from these wells under standard <br /> groundwater monitoring and sampling protocol during the first quarter 2005 sampling <br /> event <br /> Well Surveying Wells MW-11 and MW-12 were surveyed by Morrow Surveying, <br /> Inc (Morrow), a licensed surveyor, for locations and elevations relative to mean sea <br /> level Well survey data is included 1n Table 1 and Attachment 7 <br /> l <br /> FINDINGS <br /> Subsurface Conditions <br /> Soil within the boring for well MW-11 consisted of sandy silt from ground surface to <br /> approximately 11 feet bgs, underlain by sand to the depth of the boring (approximately 30 <br /> feet bgs) Soil within the boring for well MW-12 consisted mainly of sandy silt, with a layer <br /> of well graded sand between approximately 10 and 15 feet bgs, and a saturated clay layer <br /> from approximately 16 to 19 feet bgs Saturated sand was encountered at the total depth of <br /> the boring (approximately 30 feet bgs) Groundwater was first encountered in the two <br /> borings at approximately 13 feet bgs, and stabilized at approximately 11 5 to 12 75 feet bgs <br /> (Table 3) <br /> 1 1ConocoPhrilipslRetad Sdes1111931Reports111193 Off-Site Well Install 1-05 doc St;COR International Inco <br /> poorated <br />