| 
								       	Ito
<br />			Tosco Corporation,a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum Company								5
<br />			Tosco Station#11193,3202 West Hammer Lane,Stockton CA   						March 7 2002
<br />			vacuum, vapor extraction flow rates, groundwater extraction flow rates, and influent FID
<br />			readings are presented in Table 1
<br />			During the 2-hour DPE event for well VW-1, the applied vacuum was 25 in  of Hg, vapor
<br />			extraction flow rates ranged from 13 08 cfm to 15 26 cfm  Groundwater elevations for
<br />			wells MW-1R and MW-2R decreased by 0 01 feet, wells MW-8 and MW-5 increased by
<br />			0 01 feet, and well MW-9 did not show any change in groundwater elevation  FID
<br />       		readings collected from the vapor extracted ranged from 1,000 ppmv to 15,000 ppmv
<br />       		Applied vacuum, vapor extraction flow rates, groundwater extraction flow rates, and
<br />       		influent FID readings are presented in Table 1
<br />       		During the 92-hour DPE event for wells VW-1, MW-2R, and MW-1R, the applied
<br />       		vacuum ranged from 14 in of Hg to 25 in of Hg, and vapor extraction flow rates ranged
<br />       		from 13 86 cfm to 42 86 cfm  The groundwater extraction flow rates ranged from 0 01
<br />       		gpm to 6 2 gpm  Groundwater elevations for well MW-5 decreased by 0 01 feet and
<br />       		wells MW-4, MW-8, MW-3 and MW-9 increased by 0 02 feet, 0 04 feet, 0 03 feet, and
<br />       		0 03 feet, respectively  FID readings collected from the vapor extracted from all wells
<br />       		were initially 500 ppmv and decreased to 150 ppmv by the end of the test  Applied
<br />       		vacuum, vapor extraction flow rates, groundwater extraction flow rates, and influent FID
<br />       		readings are presented in Table 1
<br />       		LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA
<br />      		Laboratory analyses of soil vapor samples collected during the DPE tests are summarized
<br />       		in Table 2 and shown graphically on Figure 2  As shown on Figure 2, TPHg influent
<br />      		concentrations declined from 300 ppmv to 100 ppmv, benzene concentrations declined
<br />      		from 5 3 ppmv to 3 7 ppmv, and MtBE influent concentrations declined from 200 ppmv
<br />      		to 86 ppmv
<br />      		Groundwater samples were collected from wells MW-1R, MW-2R, and VW-1 before and
<br />      		after DPE testing  Below is a table showing the groundwater concentrations of TPHg,
<br />      		benzene, and MtBE in parts per billion (ppb) measured before and after the DPE event
<br />      		Refer to Table 3 for a more complete list showing all analyte concentrations  The bolded
<br />      		values indicate reduced analyte concentrations
<br />       		Well# 		TPHg (lvb)       		kle"erre(pleb)     		MtOE(pph)
<br />       				Before DPE       After DPE	Before DPE      After DPE      Before DPE      After DPE
<br />       		.VW 1  	<100,000 	<50,000   	<1,000    	810   	140 000  	71,000
<br />       		MW IR  	<100      	<50       	<1 0    	<0 50    	220      	160
<br />       		MW 2R 	<50,000   	<2,000     	<500     	76    	64,000   	7,700
<br />     		DPE Mass Removal Rates
<br />     		The total mass of TPHg, benzene, and MTBE removed during the test were estimated
<br />     		using the influent air analytical results, an average well field flow rate, and the time
<br />
								 |