Laserfiche WebLink
RE: Air Sample Analyses t Page 1 of 3 <br /> Vicki McCartney <br /> From: Vicki McCartney <br /> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:34 <br /> To: 'Bartonj@rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov' <br /> Subject: FW:Air Sample Analyses <br /> Jim, <br /> I am forwarding a series of e-mails between David Herzog, R.G. at Shaw Environmental., Inc. and <br /> myself, concerning my request for a revision to the analytical methods reported on the laboratory data forms used <br /> to analyze air samples. I believe the methods used for analyzing the air samples are inappropriate; however, the <br /> environmental laboratory that analyzed these samples indicated to David that EPA methods 8015, 8020, and <br /> 8260 are appropriate methods for air samples. Please forward this e-mail to Mae Hoe. I would appreciate <br /> hearing her response. <br /> Thank you, Jim. <br /> Vicki McCartney, EHS <br /> 304 E. Weber Avenue <br /> Stockton, CA 95202-2708 <br /> Phone (209)468-3456 <br /> Fax (209)468-3433 <br /> vmccartney@sjcehd.com <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Herzog, David [mailto:David.Herzog@shawgrp.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:37 PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney <br /> Subject: RE: Air Sample Analyses <br /> Tedlar bags. <br /> David W. Herzog, R.G. <br /> Shaw Environmental,Inc. <br /> 1326 North Market Boulevard <br /> Sacramento,CA 95834 <br /> (916)565-4377(direct). <br /> (916)565-4356(fax) <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Vicki McCartney [mailto:vmccartney@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:42 PM <br /> To: Herzog, David <br /> Subject: RE: Air Sample Analyses <br /> David, <br /> Were these air samples? Were they collected in Tedlar bags or Summa canisters? The chain-of-custody <br /> indicates that the sample matrix is air but does not indicate the type of container. Please clarify. <br /> Thank you. <br /> 2/14/2003 <br />