My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
3250
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545251
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 9:53:05 AM
Creation date
1/31/2020 8:26:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545251
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0001877
FACILITY_NAME
AM PM HAMMER/I5 FOOD #83113
STREET_NUMBER
3250
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
08240009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3250 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
re-open some dialogue with yo�V)both on moving the site forwardk4oward <br /> remediation and closure. The previous consultant (Shaw) had submitted a <br /> CAP on October 26, <br /> 2004 providing a cost evaluation of several remedial alternatives and <br /> selecting ozone sparging as the preferred remedial alternative. In _a <br /> letter to Parkinson dated May 27, 2005, San Joaquin County EHD approved <br /> this CAP and concurred with Shaw's proposal to install an ozone system <br /> at the site, contingent upon the. RWQCB's approval of this plan. <br /> We have reviewed the site and the groundwater data collected in the past <br /> few years since the CAP was written and approved, and although <br /> concentrations have decreased significantly since that time, we concur <br /> that ozone sparging could be a- good choice for remediation at the site. <br /> Further, at the property immediately adjacent (east) of the site at 3202 <br /> Hammer Lane, ozone sparging has been successfully ongoing for more than <br /> three years (May 2004) . <br /> Because of the already-implemented ozone sparging on the adjacent <br /> parcel, I would assume there would be little need for geochemical <br /> testing for valence state conversions .of chromium, bromine, etc and/or <br /> pilot testing of this technology. <br /> I would like RWQCB's approval to submit a work plan to proceed with <br /> ozone sparging at this site. This work plan would lay out a plan for <br /> the installation of several sparge wells and provide details on the <br /> design, permitting, equipment, monitoring and reporting plan, and <br /> implementation schedule for the ozone system. Depending on our <br /> evaluation during the preparation of this work plan, we may propose <br /> limited-duration ozone remedial events using a mobile unit, .rather than <br /> the installation of a permanent system. If either the Water Board or <br /> SJC would like to have a meeting to more thoroughly discuss the site and <br /> how we can proceed from here, we would be happy to do that as well. <br /> Please let me know your thoughts on this, as well as any specific <br /> concerns or requirements that the RWQCB has .related to ozone sparging at <br /> this site. <br /> Thanks for your time. Have a good day! <br /> -sarah <br /> Sarah O. Salcedo, P.G. <br /> Senior Geologist / Project Manager <br /> Stratus Environmental, Inc. <br /> 3330 Cameron Park Drive, Suite 550 <br /> Cameron Park, California 95682 <br /> (530) 313-9966 -- voice <br /> (530) 676-6005 -- fax <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.