Laserfiche WebLink
X - _ <br /> _ x <br /> 4 <br /> February 11, 1992 <br /> Quik Stop Markets,Inc. Page 2 <br /> Project No. 3-49132-32 <br /> r nation. Soil samples from one boring, r millioear th <br /> npetroleum hydrocarbon contami <br /> n <br /> northwest portion of the north pump island, (E-3) contained 464 parts Per <br /> (ppnt) TPHG. The groundwater sample fronea ruellas debll <br /> ntained 470 <br /> zew �talevels ls oft toluene, <br /> parts per billion(ppb)TPHG and 21 ppb ben <br /> ethyl benzene, and total xylenes. MW-1 was subsequently destroyed in October 3, 1991 <br /> due to concerns that it could connect two water bearing units which appear to represent <br /> separate shallow aquifers. <br /> On September 11, 12 and 13, 1990, Exceltech (RESNA) drilled five additional <br /> "- exploratory borings at the site and converted three las f am thef them to ge boringstir monitoring <br /> wells. The results of the analyses of the soil same <br /> ittle <br /> or no petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. Analyses of groundwater samples <br /> collected from monitoring wells wom nd 4r 2ld not were found stoany <br /> 1 ppb <br /> hydrocarbon related contaminants butsamples <br /> benzene and detectable levels of ethyl benzene and total xylenes (RESNA, September <br /> 1990). <br /> During the above investigations, a leak was discovered in the subsurface piping for the <br /> fueling system at the site. Excavations to remove the contaminated soils revealed that <br /> the contamination had affected the tank backfill and possibly the soil beneath the tank <br /> backfill. Upon issuance of the proper permits, <br /> the overhead canopy, pump islands <br /> STs) were removed in <br /> concrete surface, and three underground fuel sremoval,ge se ca atlon and soil sampling <br /> _ Following tank October and November 1980. Fol g <br /> were continued until laboratory analyses of soil samples indicated that petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon contaminated soil above the water table in the vicinity of the storage tank <br /> moved fom the station and <br /> excavation had been removed. All contaminated soil double walled 1berg ass USTs <br /> properly disposed of(Exceltech November 1990). <br /> ew were installed at the sited concrete surface and the remaining <br /> ere replaced andwas backfilled <br /> the putt ba klin <br /> The canopy, pumps, an <br /> operation in March 1991. <br /> On April 2, 1990, Exceltech (RESNA) replaced the destroyed groundwater monitoring <br /> wnas <br /> well, MW-1, with two monitoring wells, designated MW-1R and MW-5. aquifer <br /> designed to monitor the local aquifer and N4W-5 to monitor a pe q <br /> discovered during the installation of MW-1. Analyses of all subsurface and analytical <br /> data indicated the presence of two aquifers beneath the czAstern portion of site. It was <br /> found that the local aquifer had no detectable TPHG or ETEX and the perched aquifer <br /> contained TPHG and some BTEX components (RESNA,July 1991). <br /> Well Pumping and Sampling <br /> On October 15, 1991, RESNA personnel visited the site for the purpose of pumping <br /> 200 gallons of groundwater from monitoring well MW-5. This humping was agreed <br /> upon with the San Joaquin County Public Health Services (SJCPHS) as an interim <br />