Laserfiche WebLink
the well screen.This may require repeated recovery of the 8. Fractured Rock <br /> water during purging while leaving the pump in place within <br /> the well screen. In fractured rock formations,a low-flow to zero <br /> purging approach using pumps in conjunction with packers to <br /> Use of low-flow techniques may be impractical in isolate the sampling zone in the borehole is suggested. <br /> these settings,depending upon the water recharge rates. Passive multi-layer sampling devices may also provide the <br /> The sampler and the end-user of data collected from such most"representative"samples. It is imperative in these <br /> wells need to understand the limitations of the data collected; settings to identify flow paths or water-producing fractures <br /> i.e., a strong potential for underestimation of actual contami- prior to sampling using tools such as borehole flowmeters <br /> nant concentrations for volatile organics, potential false and/or other geophysical tools. <br /> negatives for filtered metals and potential false positives for <br /> unfiltered metals. It is suggested that comparisons be made After identification of water-bearing fractures, install <br /> between samples recovered using low-flow purging tech- packer(s)and pump assembly for sample collection using <br /> niques and samples recovered using passive sampling low-flow sampling in"dedicated mode"or use a passive <br /> techniques(i.e.,two sets of samples). Passive sample sampling device which can isolate the identified water-bearing <br /> collection would essentially entail acquisition of the sample fractures. <br /> with no or very little purging using a dedicated sampling <br /> system installed within the screened interval or a passive <br /> sample collection device. VI. Documentation <br /> A. Low-Permeability Formations (0.1 Umin The usual practices for documenting the sampling <br /> ' recharge) event should be used for low-flow purging and sampling <br /> techniques. This should include, at a minimum: information <br /> 1.Low-Flow Purging and Sampling with Pumps on the conduct of purging operations(flow-rate,drawdown, <br /> water-quality parameter values, volumes extracted and times <br /> "portable or non-dedicated mode"-Lower the pump for measurements), field instrument calibration data, water <br /> a. <br /> one capable of pumping at{0.1 L/min)to mid-screen sampling forms and chain of custody farms. See Figures 2 <br /> (one 3 and"Ground Water Sampling Workshop--A Workshop <br /> or slightly above and set in place far minimum of 48 <br /> M Summary"(U.S.EPA, s)for example forms and other <br /> hours(to lessen purge volume requirements). After 48 <br /> hours, use procedures listed in Part IV above regard- documentation suggestions and information.This information <br /> coupled with laboratory analytical data and validation data are <br /> ing monitoring water quality parameters for stabilize- <br /> tion,etc., but do not dewater the screen, if excessive needed to judge the"useability"of the sampling data. <br /> ' drawdown and slow recovery is a problem,then <br /> alternate approaches such as those listed below may VII.Notice <br /> be better. <br /> ' b. "dedicated mode"-Set the pump as above at least a The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency through its Office <br /> week prior to sampling;that is,operate in a dedicated of Research and Development funded and managed the <br /> research described herein as part of its in-house research <br /> pump mode. With this approach significant reductions program and under Contract No.68-C4-0031 to Dynamac <br /> in purge volume should be realized.Water quality Corporation. It has been subjected to the Agency's peer and <br /> parameters should stabilize quite rapidly due to less administrative review and has been approved for publication <br /> disturbance of the sampling zone. as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial <br /> 2. Passive Sample Collection products does not constitute endorsement or recommenda- <br /> tion for use. <br /> Passive sampling collection requires insertion of the <br /> device into the screened interval for a sufficient time period to VIII. References <br /> allow flow and sample equilibration before extraction for <br /> ' analysis. Conceptually,the extraction of water from low Backhus, DA, J.N. Ryan, D.M. Groher,J.K.McFarlane, and <br /> yielding formations seems more akin to the collection of water P.M.Gschwend. 1993.Sampling Colloids and Colloid- <br /> from the unsaturated zone and passive sampling techniques Associated Contaminants in Ground Water. Ground Water, <br /> may be more appropriate in terms of obtaining"representa- 31(3):466-479. <br /> �. tive"samples. Satisfying usual sample volume requirements <br /> is typically a problem with this approach and some latitude will Barcelona, M.J., J.A. Helfrich, E.E. Garske,and J.P.Gibb. <br /> be needed on the part of regulatory entities to achieve 1984.A laboratory evaluation of groundwater sampling <br /> sampling objectives. mechanisms. Ground Water Monitoring Review,4(2):32-41. <br /> 9 <br />