My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002895
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
3555
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545252
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002895
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 3:45:19 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 1:52:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002895
RECORD_ID
PR0545252
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0002232
FACILITY_NAME
QUIK STOP MARKET #3132*
STREET_NUMBER
3555
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
071-180-20
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3555 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RA <br /> Working to Restore Nature <br /> as shown on Plates 3 and 4, respectively. <br /> ' In the local upper aquifer, the groundwater.level <br /> rose an average of 0.32 foot; ranging from 0.27 foot in well ,MW-7:to 0:38 foot m well <br /> MW-5. In the local,.lower. aquifer, the groundwater level rose an-averse of 0.39 foo <br /> f q �. �o. g >y . <br /> ranging from 0.38 foot in wells MW-2 and MW-4 to 0.40 foot in well MW-3. The apparent <br /> groundwater flow direction in the local upper aquifer is to the southeast at a gradient of <br /> approximately 0.006 (Plate 3). -The apparent groundwater flow direction in the'local lower <br /> aquifer is to the:east-southeast at a gradient of approximately 0:003 (Plate 4). <br /> Laboratory analyses of the water samples coilected that from well MW-5 before and after <br /> pumping on February 8, 1994, (samples MW-5A and MW-5B) indicated TPHg and BTEX <br /> were not detected in these samples. Laboratory analyses:of water samples collected on <br /> March 25, 1994, indicated that TPHg and.BTEX were not detected in any of the sampled <br /> monitoring wells. Wells MW-3 and MW-4 .were not sampled because they are located. <br /> upgradient of the underground storage tanks, and historically TPHg.and BTEX have not <br /> been detected in'the groundwater from these .wells. The next quarterly groundwater <br /> fi sampling°is scheduled for June 1994. <br /> Reporting Requirements <br /> RESNA recommends a that copy this re ort be forwarded,by Quik Stop Markets, Inc., to <br /> the following agencies. <br /> Mr. Michael'Collins, R.E.H.S. <br /> E <br /> Environmental Health Specialist <br /> San-Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> P.O..Box 2009 <br /> Stockton, California 95201 <br /> { Ms. Elizabeth Thayer <br /> California Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> 3443 Routier.Road . <br /> Sacramento, California 95827-3098 <br /> Fn 93/Q14. 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.