Laserfiche WebLink
FROM 1997, 14 17:44 #888 P.06/24 <br /> February 14. 1997 J <br /> Page <br /> November 1990. SVE was initiated. The SVE system was operated from November <br /> 1990 until November 1992, with a 7 month hiatus from February to September 1992. <br /> Results of SVE operation are presented in a table included in Attachment A. <br /> Between Judy 1991 and June 1993. Groundwater Technology, Inc. (GTI) completed <br /> five groundwater monitoring wells (MUT-9 through MW-1_) and one SVE well (V-6). <br /> The groundwater monitoring wells were completed to a maximum depth of 7> feet bas <br /> and SVE Well V-6 was completed to 29 feet bgs. TPPH and benzene were only <br /> detected in the samples collected from the borings for Well MW-9 and SVE Well V-6- <br /> The sample collected at 26 feet bgs in the boring for Well MW-9 located proximal to the <br /> northern corner of the former UST.complex reported the maximum concentration of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons at 3,900 ppm TPPH-g and 1.7 ppm benzene (Figure 2, <br /> Table 2). <br /> October 1993. Chevron created a fate and transport model (October 13, 1993)to <br /> predict the down,adient concentrations of dissolved benzene from Monitoring <br /> Well MW-1 I (Attachment B). Well MW-11 had consistent benzene hits since its devel- <br /> opment in May 1992 until October 1993. The model used by Chevron estimated the half <br /> life of the dissolved benzene and the total migration distance for benzene from <br /> Well MW-11,the most downgradient monitoring well on site. Using the following <br /> assumptions,the velocity of groundwater, velocity of benzene, distance of benzene <br /> impact from Well MW-11, and the degradation rate for benzene were calculated. The <br /> assumptions for the model were steady-state site conditions, no additional hydrocarbon <br /> mass added, and a constant degradatiordattenuation rate. <br /> The model was tested against actual groundwater data and found to be 95 percent accu- <br /> rate for Well MW-3,however the model predicted much lower benzene concentrations <br /> at Well MW-11 than were actually observed. Chevron suggested that this may be due to <br /> another source area, possibly on or off site. <br /> The outcomes predicted by the model were as follows: <br /> 1. The estimated distance downgradient from Well MW-1 I to the <br /> 10 parts per billion(ppb)concentration contour would be 165 feet. <br /> 2. The estimated time it would take to degrade the initial dissolved <br /> benzene concentration in Well MW-11 (1,500 ppb) to 10 ppb would <br /> take 7,197 days or 20.4 years. <br /> December 1993. Three 50-foot confirmatory soil borings(SB-1, SB-2, and SB-3)were <br /> drilled by GTT near the former 10,000-gallon gasoline UST complex to determine the <br /> effectiveness of the SVE system(Figure 2). In addition,two 66.5-foot borings were <br /> drilled and converted to Wells MW-2R and MW-14 to replace Well MW-2, and to <br /> 3201337BCLOSLnM <br />