My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
45
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545259
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 6:04:48 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 2:30:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545259
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004966
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON USA (INACT)
STREET_NUMBER
45
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12707037
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
45 E HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
485
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� Chevron <br /> a,_� � Chevron <br /> Wo <br /> USEyq <br /> rie9+ YY <br /> 7 ;x0i 2 e, i 4S <br /> Chevron U.S.A.Products Company <br /> November 15, 1996 6001 Bollinger Canyon Road <br /> Building L <br /> San Ramon,CA 94583 <br /> P0.Box 5004 <br /> Ms.Mary Meays San Ramon,CA 94583-0804 <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> P.O.Box 388 Marketing-Northwest Region <br /> Stockton, CA 95201-0388 Phone 510 842 9500 <br /> Re: Former Chevron Station#9-1918, 45 East Harding Way, Stockton, CA <br /> Rationale supporting the proposed abandonment and replacement of 13 onsite wells <br /> Dear Ms. Meays: <br /> The following rationale for well abandonment and replacement is being provided to support the workplan <br /> prepared by Gettler-Ryan,Inc., dated November 8, 1996. In providing this information,the following <br /> philosophy was used as guidance, as was,the most recent results from groundwater monitoring and <br /> sampling(attached). <br /> Guiding Philosophy: <br /> 1.Does the present well location conflict with proposed site development plans? <br /> 2. Is the groundwater contaminant plume adequately defined? <br /> 3. Can the stability of the groundwater contaminant plume be determined/monitored? <br /> 4. How many wells can be abandoned within the specified time limit(i.e.,before 11/23/96)? <br /> i Proposed Abandonment Rationale <br /> MW-1 Located in proposed drive-thru/lxigh traffic area <br /> MW-2R Located beneath proposed building footprint <br /> MW-4 Located beneath proposed building footprint <br /> MW-5 Located in proposed drive-thru/high traffic area <br /> MW-6 Located in proposed'drive-fluu/high traffic area <br /> MW-8 Confirmed ND;Use MW-11 instead <br /> MW-9 Located beneath proposed building footprint <br /> V-1 Located beneath proposed building footprint <br /> V-2 Located beneath proposed building footprint <br /> V-3 Located beneath proposed building footprint <br /> V-4 Unnecessary vadose well;potential vertical conduit <br /> V-5 Unnecessary vadose well;potential vertical conduit <br /> V-6 Unnecessary vadose well;potential vertical conduit <br /> Proposed Replacement Rationale <br /> MW-6R (see map) Continue ability to monitor changes in plume <br /> stability/migration <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.