My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002653
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
45
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545259
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002653
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 4:29:55 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 3:04:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002653
RECORD_ID
PR0545259
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004966
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON USA (INACT)
STREET_NUMBER
45
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12707037
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
45 E HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 14, 1997 <br /> Page 1 <br /> hydrocarbons in groundwater Therefore downgi adient sampling 1 esults are deemed <br /> representative of site conditions <br /> The analysis of groundwater for methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE) was initiated in the third <br /> quarter 1996 groundwater monitoring program Groundwater collected from <br /> Well MW-9 was the only well sampled to report detectable concentrations of MtBE <br /> (2 10 ppb) During the fourth quarter monitoring program, MtBE was detected and <br /> confirmed in Well MW-9 MtBE was also detected at 20 ppb in Well MW-13, however I <br /> no detectable concentrations of MtBE were reported (above the 2 ppb detection limit) <br /> upon confirmation by EPA Method 8260 Although the MtBE concentration has been <br /> confirmed in Well MW-9, no other wells report concentrations of MtBE (including <br /> proximal Well MW-4 screened from 28 to 43 feet bgs) The occurrence is therefore <br /> isolated and the extent of migration is limited The absence of MtBE in any other <br /> site-related wells supports this <br /> Residual petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater are attenuating In fact, the dissolved <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon plume is not only stable, but is decreasing in size The Chevron <br /> Research and Technology Company (CRTC) Memorandum (April 19, 1996) evaluated <br /> intrinsic bioremediation parameters and found that present subsurface conditions are <br /> conductive to natural biodegradation of residual petroleum hydrocarbons in ground- <br /> water This evaluation is based on the measurement of groundwater for the presence of <br /> various electron acceptor compounds (dissolved sulfate, dissolved ferrous iron, dissolved <br /> nitrate, and dissolved oxygen) which if absent, limit the degree of biodegradation <br /> DISCUSSION OF RESIDUAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS <br /> Petroleum Hydrocarbons Above Background Concentrations <br /> Residual petroleum hydrocarbons remain in soil and groundwater above background <br /> concentrations as discussed in the previous sections Site remediation consisted of <br /> removing the product storage and distribution equipment, remedial excavation of areas <br /> of hydrocarbon-impacted soil, and the operation of an SVE system After nearly 2 years <br /> of operation, mass removal of petroleum hydrocarbons by the SVE system had reached <br /> an asymptotic condition when it was deactivated in November 1992 It is recognized <br /> that while SVE was an effective remediation technology which contributed considerably <br /> to the remedial effort at the site, there were environmental and system design factors that <br /> contributed to the decline of system effectiveness prior to achieving "background" soil <br /> concentrations These factors are presented below <br /> • Vapor flow to the SVE wells is affected by frictional resistance along <br /> I the well sceeen, the difference between horizontal and vertical soil <br /> permeability to air flow, and general variations in soil permeability to <br /> 3201337NCLOSURE3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.