My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002665
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
45
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545259
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002665
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 4:52:17 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 3:28:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002665
RECORD_ID
PR0545259
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004966
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON USA (INACT)
STREET_NUMBER
45
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12707037
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
45 E HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F <br /> November 30, 1995 <br /> }%r� Page 2 <br /> 2.,2.3 Secondary Source Distribution and Residual Levels <br /> Please note that PHS/EHD did not approve of the discontinuance of vapor extraction <br /> nor concur that additional remediation was not necessary In fact, PHS/EHD indicated <br /> in correspondence dated October 22, 1992 that there was not sufficient evidence to <br /> F indicate that the site was largely remediated and that further soil investigation to define <br /> the extent of soil contamination was necessary prior to the installation and operation of <br /> a final remedial system ' <br /> Section 2 2 3 was modified to more fully reflect the conditions for SVE system <br /> deactivation <br /> 2 4Interim Remediation <br /> Numerous estimates were presented with regards to the amount of hydrocarbons <br /> removed and remaining which were not substantiated with calculations Please provide <br /> in addendum[the]calculations used to ascertain the estimates presented <br /> These calculations are provided in Appendix C , <br /> 2 S Exposure Pathway <br /> The plan stated that the groundwater flow was likely the primary exposure pathway, <br /> however, no information on the use of nearby wells were available Please provide in <br /> . addendum information regarding the construction and use of wells within a 112 mile <br /> radius of the site <br /> A well survey was conducted by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc in order, <br /> to determine the location of wells withal 112 mile of the site, the survey identified 7 wells <br /> within this vicinity PACIFIC investigated the construction and use of use of these wells <br /> and the results are presented in Appendix D <br /> 3.1 Site Water Quality Goals and Protection Standards <br /> The State Water Resources Control Board has not adopted a resalution formalizing the <br /> creation of a "Water Quality Limited Zone" The State Water Resources Control <br /> Board's Resolution 92-49 was not amended to allow for the creation of a "Water <br /> Quality Limited Zone" Any reference to the San Francisco Regional Water Quality <br /> Control board Order 95-016 is not applicable within a basin that is under the authority <br /> of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> Section 3 1 was deleted, and the remaining sections containing references to WQLZs <br /> were revised' <br /> ti <br /> 3201337BICAPRESP <br /> y _ <br /> + 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.