Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> wCarbon concentration with time is observed) A significant departure from a near zero or <br /> negative trend slope will trigger implementation of the trigger activation response strategy <br /> Groundwater monitonng data will be analyzed serruannually and the results will be issued with <br /> the third quarter groundwater monitoring report Conditions under which a trigger event may <br /> result are discussed below <br /> Three primary scenarios were recognized as being possible disruptions to the existing steady- <br /> state system (the "system" is the intrinsic remediation volume being monitored) (1) an <br /> increase in dissolved hydrocarbon concentration at the source location occurs, (2) attenuation <br /> is inhibited somewhere within the system, or(3)the groundwater flow rate through the system <br /> increases As a result of any one (or combination) of the disruption scenarios mentioned, <br /> dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations could significantly increase, either at the source location <br /> or at a location somewhere within the treatment volume The increase in dissolved <br /> hydrocarbon concentration would be observed either at monitoring wells near the source, or <br /> at wells used to monitor the compliance boundary If the system adapts to the increased <br /> hydrocarbon load, it is likely the data analysis results, performed using data collected after the <br /> initial hydrocarbon concentration increase, would not change dramatically But if the system <br /> does not adapt, or attenuation is inhibited, the data analysis results would show a significant <br /> increasing (positive slope) dissolved hydrocarbon trend over time Before implementing the <br /> trigger activation response strategy, trigger validation would be done by reviewing the data <br /> • and circumstances under wluch the system changed <br /> 3.2.5 Trigger Condition <br /> The trigger activation response (Figure 10)will be implemented whenever <br /> 1 The venfied concentration of any target compound in any compliance <br /> boundary well exceeds the water quality goal(Section 3 12), or <br /> 2 The concentration versus tune trend for any target compound in any <br /> compliance boundary well exhibits a rate of increase which indicates the <br /> water quality goal will be reached or exceeded (1)before the next sched- <br /> uled sampling event, or (2) before the time required to implement the trig- <br /> ger activation response <br /> 3.2.6 Trigger Activation Response Strategy <br /> Figure 10 shows the sequence of actions that will be completed in the event a trigger condi- <br /> tion is verified <br /> r <br /> 3201337B/1918REV 14 August 31, 1995 <br /> r <br />