Laserfiche WebLink
4.0 REMEDIAL ACTION REQUIREMENTS <br /> To identify remedial action requirements and develop remedial objectives, current site condi- <br /> tions are compared to those necessary to achieve the site-specific goals outlined in the previ- <br /> ous section Where goals are achieved, remedial action is not required, conversely, where <br /> goals are not achieved, action may be required In this section, remedial action requirements <br /> are specified <br /> On January 23, 1995, groundwater quality within an area defined by Wells MW-2R, MW-10, <br /> MW-12, MW-13, and MW-14 did not meet water quality goals (the aforementioned wells <br /> define an area that would be encompassed by the proposed compliance boundary) For <br /> example, dissolved benzene concentrations were detected in groundwater samples collected <br /> from Wells MW-11 and MW-13 at levels greater than the water quality goal of 10 ppb It is <br /> also important to note that dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations are attenuating and are rela- <br /> tively low Based on recent water quality data, some form of remedial action should be <br /> considered to achieve water quality goals At minimum, action is required to finish plume <br /> delineation, determine if migration is a factor, and monitor dissolved plume containment <br /> With regard to vertical residual plume movement, any potential threat to compromise site <br /> water quality goals, as they apply to deep groundwater bodies, appears negligible This asser- <br /> tion is based on the fact that soil samples taken at the maximum depth for each soil boring <br /> installed to date show compliance with proposed soil-based groundwater quality goals In <br /> addition, the same attenuation mechanisms that may be stabilizing the dissolved plume in a <br /> lateral sense, work in the vertical sense as well It does not appear action addressing vertical <br /> migration is necessary at this time <br /> A review of soak chemistry data (December 1993, June 1995) generated as a result of investi- <br /> gation activities indicate that leachable hydrocarbon concentrations still exist in soils beneath <br /> the site The TPH-g concentrations in soil, as characterized by boring data generated in 1995, <br /> suggest hydrocarbon concentrations in soil still threaten groundwater As such, soil-based <br /> action may be required <br /> .I <br /> 3201337B/1918REV 16 August 31, 1995 <br /> , <br /> i <br />