Laserfiche WebLink
Groundwater cleanup levels are approved on a case-by-case basis by the Board. Proposed final <br /> cleanup levels are based on a discharger-developed feasibility study of cleanup alternatives that <br /> compares effectiveness, cost, time to achieve cleanup standards, and a risk assessment to determine <br /> impacts on beneficial uses, human health and the environment. Cleanup levels must also take into <br /> account the mobility, toxicity, end volume of pollutants. Feasibility studies of cleanup alternatives <br /> may include the guidance provided by Subpart E of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances <br /> Pollution Contingency Plan (40 CFR 300); Section 25356.1(c)of the California Health and Safety <br /> Code; U.S. EPA's Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; the <br /> State Water Board's Resolutions Nos. 68-16 and 92-49; and the Regional Water Board's Resolution <br /> No. 88-160. <br /> 25. Final cleanup levels for polluted groundwater shall be background water quality if feasible, but shall <br /> not be greater than the California (State) DHS drinking water Action Level (AL) or Maximum <br /> Contaminant Level (MCL), whichever as more stringent An AL does not apply if an MCL has <br /> been adopted for the chemical pollutant - <br /> 26. The Federal EPA has adopted Maximum Contaminant Levels MCLS for pollutants, and the State <br /> and Federal MCLS are not always identical. The Federal EPA has also adopted Maximum <br /> Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs) for certain chemicals, which may be lower than the Federal <br /> MCLs. Groundwater cleanup standards for the site are the more stringent of the Federal or State <br /> MCLS. The current Federal and State MCLs/MCLGs for VOCs of interest, and the appropriate <br /> MCL for this site, are tabulated below, in Table 1. <br /> Table l: MCLS for VOCs of Interest (ug/l) ` <br /> k Chemical Federal MCLlMCLG State MCL <br /> 1,1-DCE 7 6 <br /> 1,1-DCA _ 5 <br /> 1,1,1 TCA 200/200 200 <br /> NON-ATTATNMENT AREA <br /> r <br /> 27. Available options for removing or treating in situ groundwater pollution are limited. At many sites <br /> in this region and elsewhere, pump and treat technology is not adequate to meet low cleanup <br /> standards because the costs and timeframe may be prohibitive Groundwater pollution cleanup is <br /> a lengthy process which requires significant resources <br /> 28 Varian has documented the following in its RI/FS <br /> a An appropriate cleanup program, including adequate source removal, has been frilly <br /> implemented and reliably operated for a period of time which is adequate to <br /> understand both the hydrogeology of the site and pollutant dynamics, and <br /> b Groundwater pollutant levels have reached an asymptotic level, and <br /> 6 <br />