FIELD DOCUMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 1 of 2 Mike Infurna [EH] From: Wingfield, Jeff owingfield@stocktonport.com] Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 11:36 AM To: Mike Infurna[EH]; alexastamets@ch2m.com Subject: RE: permits and property lines? Mr. Infurna, I have been made aware of the error of the address but understand that the physical location of the well will remain the same as was displayed on the map. If this is the case I do not have any problem with the address change. R 252,4, W L)J Sincerely, Jeff Jeffrey D.Wingfield I Environmental Manager I Port of Stockton I 12201 W.Washington St.,Stockton,CA 95203 1 jwingfield@stocktonport.com 1 1209.946.0246 1209.464.1251 fax I -----Original Message----- From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 4:17 PM To: alexastamets@ch2m.com Cc: Wingfield, Jeff Subject: permits and property lines? hello, I'm the County Health inspector assigned to issue permits at this site. I've receive the CH2M Hill recently submitted packet of permit applications,work plan,checks,and access agreements monitoring well installations at and around Koppel Station,2025 W.Washingtion St,Stockton. Although a CF'RWQCB site, San Joaquin County EHD is the boring permit issuing agency for all drilling in our County and I'll be the one processing the applications. In researching the property lines and ownership,I noticed that the permit application CH2M Hill signed for "2025 Hazelton/Headwater Resources" was submitted for two monitoring wells, "KP- 11S" and "KP-10S"and is not quite correct. Based on the San Joaquin County Assessor's Map of this area, only one well, "KP-11S" is truly on/within the property lilies for the 2025 W. Washington/Headwaters' Resources parcel. Well "KP-10S" is on the adjacent parcel with address 2526 W. Washington, along with "KP-12S". I've attached a copy of the assessors map for your review. Please compare this with your "Figure 1" and see how-it isn't hard to see why with the tenant lines so strange in this area. I superimposed the County Assessor recognized parcels lines onto the CH2M Hill figure 1 to represent the borders of the two parcels and where I think the wells are planned. Attached are two maps. One is the SJCo Assessor's map and the other is your Figure 1 with my superimposed property/tenant line. It's a bad copy on one,but if you look close you can see the strange 'key' kickout of the property line in this area... Additionally, I've placed a call to the Port of Stockton's,Jeff Wingfield, to verify that he/POS 6/15/2006