Laserfiche WebLink
' San Joaquin County-Public Works <br /> Second Half 2015(Semi-Annual)Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> ' Site Background <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> November 3, 2012 groundwater monitoring event were documented in The Fourth Quarter 2011 <br /> ' Groundwater Monitoring Report, November 2011, dated January 20, 2012. <br /> Between November 3, 2011 and April 17, 2012, the groundwater surface in the seven monitoring wells <br /> ' rose an average of 0.96 feet, the groundwater gradient decreased to 0.0014 ft/ft, and the direction of <br /> groundwater flow remained toward the northeast. The groundwater flow direction and gradient appear to <br /> be consistent with recent historical trends. <br /> Detected concentrations of gasoline compounds in groundwater samples collected on November 3, 2011 <br /> and April 17, 2012 were generally similar in MW-1, MW-2, MW-4, and MW-6. The concentration of <br /> ' MTBE in down-gradient well MW-4 increased from 48 to 88 µg/1. The results of the April 17, 2012 <br /> groundwater monitoring event were documented in The Second Quarter 2012 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Report, April 2012, dated May 23, 2012. <br /> ' Interim remediation was initiated on April 23, 2012. Interim remediation began with soil vapor extraction <br /> from MW-1. <br /> ' Between April 17, 2012 and September 28, 2012, the groundwater surface in the seven monitoring wells <br /> dropped by an average of 0.10 feet, the groundwater gradient increased to 0.0016 ft/ft, and the direction <br /> of groundwater flow remained toward the northeast. The groundwater flow direction and gradient appear <br /> ' to be consistent with recent historical trends. <br /> Detected concentrations of gasoline compounds in groundwater samples collected on April 17, 2012 and <br /> ' November 28, 2012 were generally similar in MW-1, MW-2, and MW-4. The concentration of MTBE in <br /> down-gradient well MW-4 decreased from 88 to 59 gg/l. The results of the September 28, 2012 <br /> groundwater monitoring event were documented in the Third Quarter (Semi-Annual) 2012 Groundwater <br /> ' Monitoring Report and Interim Remediation Update, September 2012, dated January 14, 2013. <br /> The interim remediation system was reconfigured on November 5, 2012 to remove soil vapor from soil <br /> vapor well SVE-213 because hydrocarbon concentrations in MW-1 had dropped to 660 parts per million <br /> vapor(ppmv). The threshold for cost efficient operation of a SVE unit is generally considered to be 1,000 <br /> ppmv. On January 10, 2013 air injection at air sparge well AS-1 was initiated. Extraction from SVE-2B <br /> continued until February 27, 2013. The system was shut down on two occasions due to the large quantity <br /> ' of water being removed with the soil vapor. The entrained water in the soil vapor was caused by high <br /> groundwater elevations. Continued operation was considered to be not cost effective due to high ground <br /> water and low soil vapor concentrations at that time. Interim remediation was discontinued on February <br /> 27, 2013. Interim remediation activities were documented in the Interim Remediation Report, dated June <br /> 6, 2013. <br /> ' Between September 28, 2012 and March 20, 2013, the groundwater surface in the monitoring wells rose <br /> an average of 1.09 feet, the groundwater gradient decreased to 0.0015 ft/ft, and the direction of <br /> groundwater flow remained toward the northeast. The groundwater flow direction and gradient appear to <br /> ' be consistent with recent historical trends. <br /> Detected concentrations of gasoline compounds in groundwater samples collected on September 28, 2012 <br /> ' and March 20 and 21, 2013, were generally similar in MW-1, MW-2, and MW-4. The concentration of <br /> MTBE in down-gradient well MW-4 decreased from 59 to 34 µg/1. The results of the March 20, 2013 <br /> groundwater monitoring event were documented in the First Quarter 2013 (Biennial) Groundwater <br /> Monitoring Report-March 2013, dated June 5, 2013. <br />