My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARLAN
>
10842
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545272
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 6:00:35 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 4:32:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545272
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006898
FACILITY_NAME
RAMOS OIL-FRENCH CAMP
STREET_NUMBER
10842
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
HARLAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
FRENCH CAMP
Zip
95231
APN
19333028
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
10842 S HARLAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Beneto Inc. -2- <br /> Claim No. 18588 t <br /> the proposed removal of your claim, and provided an opportunity to correct the condition <br /> that is the basis for the proposed removal. Your claim will be barred from further <br /> participation in the Fund, if the claim application contains a material error resulting from 4 <br /> fraud or misrepresentation. <br /> I <br /> Record keeping: During your cleanup project you should keep complete and well <br /> organized records of all corrective action activity and payment transactions. If you are <br /> eventually issued a LOC, you will be required to submit: (1) copies of detailed invoices <br /> for all corrective action activity performed (including subcontractor invoices); (2) copies <br /> of canceled checks used to pay for work shown on the invoices; (3) copies of technical <br /> documents (bids, narrative work description, reports), and;(4) evidence that the claimant <br /> -�=paid for-the work performed (not-paid-by-another party). These documents are, , . <br /> -- - -necessary-for reimbursement.and failure to submit them could impact the amount-of— <br /> reimbursement made by the Fund. It is not necessary to submit these documents <br /> at this time; however, they will definitely be,required prior to reimbursement. <br /> i <br /> Compliance with Corrective Action Requirements: In order to be reimbursed for your <br /> eligible costs of cleanup incurred after December 2, 1991, you must have complied with <br /> corrective action requirementsof Article 11, Chapter 16, Division 3, Title 23, California <br /> Code of Regulations. Article 11 categorized the corrective action process into phases. <br /> In addition, Article 11 requires the responsible party to submit an investigative <br /> workplan/Corrective Action Plan (CAP) before performing any work. This phasing <br /> process and the workplan/CAP requirements were intended to: <br /> 1. help the responsible party undertake the necessary corrective action in a cost- <br /> effective, efficient and timely manner; <br /> 2. enable the regulatory agency to review and approve the proposed cost-effective <br /> corrective action.alternative before any corrective action work was performed; and ' <br /> i <br /> 3. ensure the Fund will only reimburse the most cost-effective corrective action <br /> alternative required by the regulatory agency to achieve the minimum.cle_anup <br /> necessary to protect human health, safety and the environment. 4 <br /> In some limited situations interim cleanup will be necessary to mitigate a demonstrated <br /> immediate hazard to public health, or the environment. Program regulations allow the <br /> responsible party to undertake interim remedial action after: (1) notifying the regulatory <br /> agency of the proposed action, and; (2) complying with any requirements that the <br /> regulatory agency may set. Interim remedial action should only be proposed when <br /> necessary to mitigate an immediate demonstrated hazard. Implementing interim <br /> remedial action does not eliminate the requirement for a CAP and an evaluation <br /> of the most cost-effective corrective action alternative. <br /> I <br /> Califorizia1'nvimlimealalPmlecliow Agency <br /> ' - pp�RecydedPape� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.