Laserfiche WebLink
Beneto Inc. -2- <br /> Claim No. 18588 t <br /> the proposed removal of your claim, and provided an opportunity to correct the condition <br /> that is the basis for the proposed removal. Your claim will be barred from further <br /> participation in the Fund, if the claim application contains a material error resulting from 4 <br /> fraud or misrepresentation. <br /> I <br /> Record keeping: During your cleanup project you should keep complete and well <br /> organized records of all corrective action activity and payment transactions. If you are <br /> eventually issued a LOC, you will be required to submit: (1) copies of detailed invoices <br /> for all corrective action activity performed (including subcontractor invoices); (2) copies <br /> of canceled checks used to pay for work shown on the invoices; (3) copies of technical <br /> documents (bids, narrative work description, reports), and;(4) evidence that the claimant <br /> -�=paid for-the work performed (not-paid-by-another party). These documents are, , . <br /> -- - -necessary-for reimbursement.and failure to submit them could impact the amount-of— <br /> reimbursement made by the Fund. It is not necessary to submit these documents <br /> at this time; however, they will definitely be,required prior to reimbursement. <br /> i <br /> Compliance with Corrective Action Requirements: In order to be reimbursed for your <br /> eligible costs of cleanup incurred after December 2, 1991, you must have complied with <br /> corrective action requirementsof Article 11, Chapter 16, Division 3, Title 23, California <br /> Code of Regulations. Article 11 categorized the corrective action process into phases. <br /> In addition, Article 11 requires the responsible party to submit an investigative <br /> workplan/Corrective Action Plan (CAP) before performing any work. This phasing <br /> process and the workplan/CAP requirements were intended to: <br /> 1. help the responsible party undertake the necessary corrective action in a cost- <br /> effective, efficient and timely manner; <br /> 2. enable the regulatory agency to review and approve the proposed cost-effective <br /> corrective action.alternative before any corrective action work was performed; and ' <br /> i <br /> 3. ensure the Fund will only reimburse the most cost-effective corrective action <br /> alternative required by the regulatory agency to achieve the minimum.cle_anup <br /> necessary to protect human health, safety and the environment. 4 <br /> In some limited situations interim cleanup will be necessary to mitigate a demonstrated <br /> immediate hazard to public health, or the environment. Program regulations allow the <br /> responsible party to undertake interim remedial action after: (1) notifying the regulatory <br /> agency of the proposed action, and; (2) complying with any requirements that the <br /> regulatory agency may set. Interim remedial action should only be proposed when <br /> necessary to mitigate an immediate demonstrated hazard. Implementing interim <br /> remedial action does not eliminate the requirement for a CAP and an evaluation <br /> of the most cost-effective corrective action alternative. <br /> I <br /> Califorizia1'nvimlimealalPmlecliow Agency <br /> ' - pp�RecydedPape� <br />