Laserfiche WebLink
I amounts of toluene. Both constituents were present in <br /> 2 concentrations well below the drinking water standard. <br /> 3 During the week of October 81 1990, SG&D conducted a <br /> 4 supplemental site assessment at the site, which included. the <br /> 5 advancement of four drill holes to depths ranging from 30-90 feet <br /> 6 below the ground surface-. SG&D was unable to install a proper <br /> 7 groundwater monitoring well at the site but collected a water <br /> 8 sample from one of the bora holes. Neither the soil cuttings <br /> 9 from the four bdre holes nor the groundwater sample contained <br /> to detectible- :concentrations of hydrocarbon contamination. <br /> 1Z By letter to. Color Spot dated April 2, 1993, the Health <br /> 12 Department indicated thot notwithstanding the clean closure, <br /> 13 color Spot must submit a work plan providing for .(1) the <br /> 14 investi:gation: o.f the vertical extent of the contamination in the <br /> is tan* excavation and (2): the installation of three monitoring <br /> 16 wells at the site. In addition, the Health Department has <br /> 27 requested that .quarterly status reports be submitted to the. <br /> 1S Health Department and. that the domestic wells on site be <br /> 1!9 monitored quarterly for gasoline contamination. ;Color Spot <br /> 20 believes that case. clnsure should be granted. ;in this matter. <br /> 21 Color Spat has Oonducted. adequate invest3.gat-icon at the site, and. <br /> 22 the data indicatest that the tank did not leak. Calor SpWO <br /> 23 position. : s more specifically set forth in the letter from <br /> 24 Wilson, Sonsi.ni:, Goodrich & Rosati to the Health Department dated <br /> 25i May 261 1+09`3, s copy of which is .attached as Exhibit B. <br /> 26 Color Spot representatives and the Health Department met on <br /> 27 August 2, 1.993 to discuss the case, but were unable to resolve <br /> 28 their 4ifferOnC*S-..1 The Health Department: has extended thel date <br /> -3- MVMC% OLORSFrA.A EAL.P145P2Y <br />