Laserfiche WebLink
SGO <br /> Chlor Spot, -Inc, July 22, 1493 <br /> Mr. I ovin Adazns 'age <br /> However,, the data. obtained from 17 additional soil samples. collected and chemically <br /> analyzed in the vicinityof the farmer UST over the past 4 years, utilizing detections limits <br /> substantially lower ithan file applied action level Drinking Water Starydartl (DWS) for benzene, <br /> .. <br /> indicate:that no benzene concentration.has been detected. No benzene concentration in excess iof <br /> the OWS has been detected h the soils in the vicinity of the :former UST. For additional <br /> information pertaining to these additional soil samples and additional assessment conducted.at the <br /> site, Please refer to the following environmental assessment/remediation projects performed at the <br /> site. _ <br /> • Soil Vapor.Survey Assessment conducted August 15, 1989; <br /> • Rtmediatidn of Diesel Fuel Contaminated Soil conducted.lanuaryl 19 0; and: <br /> Supplemental Site Assessment conducted October, <br /> In addition, in our March_1989 report,;we stated that the additional contaminants which were <br /> detected at the site (toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes) were "widespread." This statement was <br /> made without the benefit:of the subsequent chemical analysis of soil samples collected following <br /> the excavation of additional soils in the vicinity of the former UST Based on SGD`s field <br /> observations and the results of the chemical analysis of the verification sail samples collected, it is <br /> clear that (a) all contaminated soil associated with the UST has apparently been removed and <br /> disposed of, (b)the detected fuel constituents(which did not include benzene) were limited in extent <br /> and were apparently caused by overfilling of the UST, not leaking of the UST; and (c) the soils <br /> remaining in the wails and flour of the resultant UST excavation following soils- remediation <br /> activities are free of actionable concentrations of fuel contaminants. <br /> Therefore, it is our professional opinion that the following can be concluded <br /> Concentrations of benzene have not been detected in the soils surrounding and <br /> adjacent to the former UST; <br /> The soil contamination which was observed daring the time of the UST = <br /> removal and required remediation has beery excavated and disposed pf; and: <br /> The U-ST has not: contributed to the regional benzene contaminated ground <br /> water problem which exists in the area. <br />