|
Services 6f Mead Data Central, Inr-
<br /> PA5E 12
<br /> 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 30233, Z,6
<br /> were ordered 0271 not to interfere in any manner with the EPA/state
<br /> ,,
<br /> activities, under pain of sig'nificant. ti.vil penalties, including punitivedamages. Heindler I at 93.
<br /> footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r
<br /> ntO The order required, inter alia,, that EPA officials and other authorizeid
<br /> .ge rs onnel , including state officials, be given
<br /> A. Access to [plaintiffs' :Property:J for the followiiq
<br /> q: purposes:
<br /> locatinqEil constructing, operatinq,, maintaining, and repairing,
<br /> onitor� Pextraction wells; (2),, taking, measurements and samples from thoselwell.s.
<br /> ,-
<br /> (3) performing'Aroundwateir extraction operations,, if necessary, including
<br /> off-site disposal of: such :extracted groundwater
<br /> B,. Access to [plaintiffs' Propertyl to accomplish: all the activities
<br /> described in paragraph A. of: this Order., and any necessary activities incident..
<br /> :.thereto, which ;shall include but shall not be limited to staring and i I
<br /> transportitIq qr�:oundwater, and` con5tructlnq facilities for such purposes, and the
<br /> in5tal- lation, operation, maintenance and repair of electric lines,..' pipes and
<br /> vto.raqe, :tanks..
<br /> C. Access. to I plai.miti,f f s 9 property]ty] to conduct any .and all othet actiVities
<br /> hilecessary to: investigate,, monitor,
<br /> survey, test and perform information
<br /> q4thetinq to' identify the existence and extent of the re
<br /> lease of hazardous
<br /> substances or the threat thereof, the source and nature. Of the hazardous :l�
<br /> N 44bstan.ce54 Pollutants or contaminants involved, and, the :e tent of the danger t.a
<br /> e,
<br /> pablit' heaIttl or welfare or to the environment.
<br /> 1. 444midler :1 it :93.
<br /> - - - - - - - -End Footnotes-
<br /> A
<br /> The trial judge construed this Order as "not purport(inq] to dispossess
<br /> plaintiffs or limit their use of the property. While [the Order's-I 6NIM
<br /> Were expansiye, they were not necessarily inimical to simultaneous use oflth
<br /> ptoperty by pla nt- fft. as lonq as they did not interfere with defendant's
<br /> admlttedly- - =beneficent activities." . endler I at 951.,
<br /> �44con tel Yet theteanip_q and purpose of the clons t itutIonal
<br /> prose tions
<br /> und:� ng the Fifth: Amendment., The 6overnment ddtlriot lave the right sok
<br /> -possess proper V owner, Among
<br /> declare 1. to-tenant-In ton with a
<br /> .5 h
<br /> c ijt izen i including a property owneris -- most :C tr Ished rights is the. right
<br /> U, 8,
<br /> to bg let alone l 01ist"d v. united States,, 277 4. 41 1. -2. . (Brandeis:
<br /> 4) gr fidei.s.,
<br /> qe erall
<br /> J4 diSsentIngf,' see n y, Wa:rrtn & Brandeis 4
<br /> to. Privat 149ty.-
<br /> the A
<br /> L. . Rev. 153 (1.890) .
<br /> In the Oundleof rig.hts. we call property, one of the mast
<br /> . . . .. .. .... . . valu . the. rig..h
<br /> t
<br /> to 4010 And, 0xclustve possess1dn the right to exclude .strangers, or fd0that
<br /> "Mtter friends, .butiSoiciall the Governmint.
<br /> ,
<br /> See Nollan v.. California
<br /> Cdastal Comaln -4.83 U.S. at 811.- Loretto v. Telepromptir manhattanrp
<br /> CATV Ct
<br /> 458: -US. .419, 4.26 (19,82.) - C*291, I.n. re Etter, 756 F:il.d. .852 859, zn Uspe 6
<br /> Ci.r..) It cert.. den:10%.0 4:74 V!U 45.ii. 828 (1985) ("The 05sen.c.e. of all pr.dPeAty j.t
<br /> thi? ♦tIght. td. eXcluft 4. Connell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.:
<br /> 722 F.Zd: i
<br /> NEXIS EXIS"NEXIS
<br />
|