My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003767
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAZELTON
>
375
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540905
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003767
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2020 10:10:09 AM
Creation date
2/3/2020 9:09:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003767
RECORD_ID
PR0540905
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023406
FACILITY_NAME
SIERRA LUMBER MANUFACTURERS
STREET_NUMBER
375
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAZELTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
147120808
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
375 W HAZELTON AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> I <br /> 29 March 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0448 <br />' Page 2 of 5 <br />' 2 2 - GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> Following well purging, ground water levels in monitoring wells MW-1, MW-4A, MW-4B, MW-6 <br />' and MW-8 were allowed to achieve a minimum of 80 percent recharge prior to sample collection <br /> Ground water samples were collected from the purged wells utilizing new, disposable polyethylene <br /> bailers and three 40-ml EPA-approved VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a <br /> sample preservative Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the vials <br />' after filling and capping Ground water sample containers were labeled with the well designation, <br /> date, time, and sampler's initials <br /> I <br /> 23 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES ` <br /> Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form, placed in a chilled container and <br /> transported to a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory for analysis <br /> for <br /> . Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g)by EPA Methods 5030/8015 <br /> Modified, <br /> • Volatile aromatic compounds - benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX) with <br /> Imethyl-tertiary butyl ether(MTBE) by EPA Method 8020, <br /> • Fuel oxygenated compounds -methanol, ethanol, tertiary butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether <br /> (DIPE), ethyl tert butyl ether (ETBE), tert amyl methyl ether(TAME) and MTBE by EPA <br /> Method 8260 Modified, and <br /> •. 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) by EPA Method 8260 <br /> IModified <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> s <br />' AGE determined ground water flow direction and gradient from the field data collected on 18 <br /> January 2001, the contaminant impact to ground water was assessed from the laboratory data <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The depths to ground water in wells MW-1, MW-4A, MW-4B, MW-6 and MW-8 were measured <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.