My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003771
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAZELTON
>
375
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540905
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003771
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2020 10:06:44 AM
Creation date
2/3/2020 9:11:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003771
RECORD_ID
PR0540905
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023406
FACILITY_NAME
SIERRA LUMBER MANUFACTURERS
STREET_NUMBER
375
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAZELTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
147120808
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
375 W HAZELTON AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 February 2000 _ <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0448 <br /> Page 22 of 33 <br />' 8 3 b Feasibility <br /> In-situ bioremediation of hydrocarbon-impacted soil at the site has a low feasibility The results of <br />' the analysis Indicated that selected hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms were present at 3 CFUs <br /> per gram from EW1-25 and 1 CFU per gram from MW8-25 The laboratory indicated that the <br /> physicochernical conditions at the site were adequate to support microbial growth and bioremedial <br /> activity However, the analysis indicated that biodegradation was occurring at a slow rate due to the <br /> small percentage of biodegraders The laboratory suggested that alternative carbon sources (I e <br /> organic debris) may have become the dominant food source for native microorganisms <br /> 8 3 7 Estimated Cost For In-Situ Bloremediation _ <br /> Due to the low number of hydrocarbon-degrading organisms at the site, the cost for in-situ <br /> I bioremediation is uncertain, and will depend upon the volume of Inoculant required, the number of <br /> remediation wells to be inoculated and the duration of bioremedial activity Generally, the <br /> Implementation cost for in-situ bioremediation will range from $35,000 to $75,000 Furthermore, <br /> weekly and monthly monitoring generally costs between $10,000 and $20,000 annually, soil <br /> probings to monitor bioremediation progress typically averages $10,000 to $15,000 annually <br /> Therefore, the total cost can range from $55, 000 and $110,000 annually <br /> 8 4 NATURAL ATTENUATION <br /> I z <br /> Natural attenuation, or passive bioremediation, is a remedial alternative that relies on natural <br /> processes to degrade hydrocarbons Natural attenuation is a passive remediation method and does <br /> require a high level of characterization and long-term monitoring <br /> 8 4 1 Principles <br /> Biodegradation is the most Important natural attenuation mechanism No additional bacteria or <br /> nutrients are added to the soil Essential nutrients required for biodegradation are usually naturally <br /> present in the subsurface However,where high concentrations of hydrocarbons are present,nutrients <br /> may be consumed before hydrocarbon remediation is complete Oxygen depletion in the subsurface <br /> is another characteristic of passive biodegradation The care of a contaminant plume typically exists <br /> iunder anaerobic conditions and only the margins are aerobic Therefore, even though anaerobic <br /> biodegradation is much slower than aerobic biodegradation, anaerobic processes may dominate the <br /> degradation of contaminants Natural attenuation is normally used where low concentrations of <br /> v <br /> Advanced GeoEmiron mental,Inc <br /> i i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.