Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> l <br /> 15 February 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Protect No 98-0448 ` <br />' Page 25 of 33 <br />' 9 1 3 Monitoring Activities <br /> One of the potential problems associated with air sparging is lateral spreading of the contaminant <br />' plume This can be caused by either mounding of ground water above irilection points or Iatetal air <br /> flow away from sparging wells To detect this problem, ground water elevations in monitoring wells <br /> and extraction wells (if appropriate) should be monitored on a monthly basis, at the minimum, to <br />' detect mounding and the presence of organic vapor <br />' 9 1 4 Feasibility <br /> In-situ air sparging of dissolved hydrocarbons in ground water at the site has a moderate to high <br />' feasibility at the site Based on data collected during the 1AS feasibility pilot, conditions at the site <br /> are conducive for air sparging activity Remediation of ground water at the site would require only <br /> a moderate number of infection and extraction points and utilization of a small area for an <br /> underground injection/extraction piping network Air infection and extraction rates must be balanced <br /> to prevent tfie Mimed migration of contaminants <br /> Based on the guide How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup Technologies For UST Sites (October <br /> 1994) published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) Office of USTs, LAS <br />' is generally effective when permeability rates are greater than 10-9 (Exhibit VII-11) Results of the <br /> laboratory analysis indicated that permeability conditions at the site are adequate for air sparging <br /> activity <br /> Soil in the saturated zone between twenty and thirty-five feet and forty-five and ray feet has a <br /> moderate amount of sand content, potentially making IAS effective for this zone Figures 5 and 6 <br />' depict cross sections, showing subsurface soil types at the site An IAS pilot test was performed at <br /> the site, results of the pilot test are summarized in Section 4 0 <br />' A concern with IA.S is precipitation of iron and/or manganese,which can cause clogging of sparging <br /> points Laboratory analysis of iron at the site indicated that iron concentrations in ground water at <br /> the site are adequate for IAS Another concern with IAS could be air flow channeling between the <br />' bottom sand interval and the intermediate silt/clay'interval However, a balanced spacing of SVE <br /> wells screened through the silty/clay interval should alleviate any air flow channeling <br /> 1 <br /> 915 Duration <br />' Air sparging in moderately permeable aquifers generally result in remediation rates comparable with <br /> soil vapor extraction rates At the site, we estimate a remediation period of 12 to 24 months for <br /> Advanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> f <br />