My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003771
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAZELTON
>
375
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540905
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003771
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2020 10:06:44 AM
Creation date
2/3/2020 9:11:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003771
RECORD_ID
PR0540905
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023406
FACILITY_NAME
SIERRA LUMBER MANUFACTURERS
STREET_NUMBER
375
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAZELTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
147120808
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
375 W HAZELTON AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
u <br /> i <br /> r i r <br /> _ w i <br /> 15 February 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Protect No 98-0448 <br /> Page 27 of 33 <br />' 9 2 2 Feasibility Studies <br /> There are several disadvantages to "pump and treat" methods The most serious disadvantages <br />' include 1) extended cleanup periods, resulting in increased total costs, although the maintenance <br /> for this method is relatively cost-effective and 2) regulatory cleanup goals are rarely attainable, <br /> mostly due to persistent hydrocarbons detected during subsequent sampling events Ground water <br />' extraction is generally not a desirable method for remediation, however this technology,is useful for <br /> hydraulic control to prevent spreading of the contaminant plume or to capture MTBE-impacted <br /> groundwater MTBE is not a contaminant of concern at the site <br /> 1 <br />' 9 2 3 Duration <br /> Experience has shown that all systems involving ground water extraction require much more time <br /> than would be anticipated from aquifer tests and calculations of ground water discharge rates, and <br /> seldom achieve regulatory goals for ground water clean-up Systems typically operate for several <br /> years During this time, pumps and other equipment may need replacement several times A <br /> treatment period of 12 to 24 months is estimated for the site <br />' 9 2 4 Cost <br /> Ground water extraction is usually a very costly method of ground water treatment Costs for' <br />' installation of a"pump and treat" system typically ranges from $25,000 to $40,000 Once extracted, <br /> the contaminated water must be treated and/or will require disposal Treatment is highly dependant <br /> upon the concentrations of dissolved hydrocarbons in the ground water, the cost per gallon could be <br />' as great as$2 00 Based upon the extraction/treatment of approximately 229,268 gallons(See Section <br /> 6) of contaminatM ground water Costs for the entire treatment project would likely exceed <br /> $498,536 <br /> 1 r r <br /> 9 3 IN-SITU BIOREMEDIATION/BIOENHANCEMENT <br /> Bioremediation involves the introduction of hydrocarbon-degrading microbes or supplemental <br />' nutrients to enhance naturally-occurring bacteria, through wells into the ground water The microbes <br /> degrade hydrocarbons and spread laterally(and vertically) by migration and reproduction <br />' Hydrocarbon-degrading microbes are able to metabolize hydrocarbons and assimilate the resulting <br /> orga,nic chemicals into biomass for reproduction and growth Typically, the light-end hydrocarbons <br /> are degraded first, followed by heavier compounds <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.