Laserfiche WebLink
.�—.,.».. --,.. -- s'. � �... . ., � _G..« " -- '" __ _•• __..... � _ .. ..� ..., , ..lei:,l lL.t, �r,� ti'1�h�54&_.aL1 ix._;_ }- _ <br /> e <br /> i <br /> 15 February 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Protect No 98-0448 <br /> rPage 31 of 33 <br />' 10 1 REMEDIATION OF HYDROCARBON-RvIPACTED SOIL <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbon-Impacted soil in the vadose zone appears to be limited to the area containing <br />' wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-4, VW-1, VW-2, EW-1 and soil bonngs B-T and B-2 Impacted soil at <br /> the site has an estimated north-south diameter of approximately 70 feet, a east-west diameter of 50 <br /> feet and appears to extend downward to depths in excess of 50 bsg (See Figures 7, 8 and 9) The <br />' greatest concentrations of impacted soil is present at depths between 10 and 35 feet, while declining <br /> concentrations are present from 35 and 50 feet <br />' Because there appears to be a low feasibility for excavation,bioremediation and natural attenuation, <br /> then SVE appears to be the best remedial alternative for the site However, the majority of <br /> petroleum-impacted soil is submerged beneath the ground water table (saturated zone) Therefore, <br />' petroleum contaminants submerged beneath the ground water table will need to be mechanically <br /> stripped from the dissolved and adsorbed phases (air sparge) and vented into the vadose zone for <br /> recovery Soil remediation methods, estimated durations and associated costs are summarized on <br /> Table 11 <br /> AGE recommends the following actions for remediation of hydrocarbon-impacted soil at the site <br /> 1 Preparation of a Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP) detailing the proposed SVE system <br />' 2 Design and install a SVE system <br /> 3 Soil-gas concentrations were detected between 170 and 1,880 ,ug/l, therefore an activated <br />' carbon SVE system should be installed to remediate the site to acceptable levels Operation <br /> of the SVE system at the site should be capable or removing between 70 and 80 percent of <br /> volatile contaminant by volume <br /> The SVE system will provide recovery and treatment of the "sparged" contaminants A <br />' thermal/catalytic system is not required at this time since there is a relatively small amount of <br /> impacted-soil within the present vadose zone A vacuurn/canmster-system will provide much higher <br /> efficiency with less supplemental fuel usage and lower energy cost <br />' The total duration of the remediation at the site will likely be approximately 12 to 24 months to <br /> allow for removal of the bulk of dissolved hydrocarbon from the ground water at the site <br /> 1 <br /> 10 2 REMEDIATION OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED GROUND WATER <br />' would be more feasible from a cost and operation perspective, over <br /> An in-situ remediation method P p p <br /> an ex-situ remediation method (I a pump and treat) The in-situ method(air sparging in conjunction <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> w _ <br />